American Crime Story

Now back in the 1997th year, the court on Oh, Jay Simpson inspired David Lynch to create a great movie, under the name "Highway in anywhere". "Time to kill" with Matthew McConaughey, the classic "Twelve angry men" and"Justice for all" with young and magnificent al Pacino — a part of all these movies can be found in the first season of AIP, telling the case of "People vs. Sipmson". From it consciously or no, but borrowed the share of his soul.

Racist a touch of film Matthew, suspense-meeting of the jury of"Twelve men", the final diatribe, full of personal pain and moral of the "Justice for all".

Consciously or no, but the first season of "American crime story" has incorporated the from many classic (or not) masterpieces of Hollywood. And, accordingly, instantly got a near tangible advantages.

Realism — API looks sometimes as a documentary film that says frankly about share the truth in artistic scenarios. Ambiguous result only confirms that feeling. A clear answer to the question, who was killer — no. Though we unambiguous hint it (this can Especially be seen for those who know the real story of sportsmen actor)- but the absolute answer is still not available.

Acting — she obviously just gorgeous. I am most impressed with Courtney Vance (who played, incidentally, in the remake of 12 angry men). Although the TV-edition of the classic film and out useless, Vance great that there, that here. Yeah and especially here — he's just the best. Travolta — with its ambiguous character did fine(In my opinion, the best part of the great "pulp Fiction"). Cuba Gooding was outstanding, probably the best its role after the well-known "Military diver" with Robert De Niro. Yes, talent it is, as always have been. And he lost to happiness. A convincing character. Schwimmer — his character turned out almost the most powerful. Self-torture, uncertainty in their actions, a kind of duality and the choice between family and correct. All this very hard to show on a blue screen, but Schwimmer successfully managed very happy with it. The Duo of Sarah Paulson and Sterling brown — a strong pair of prosecutors. As in terms of characters, and terms of acting submission.

Cinematography — a miracle. Another confirmation of the fact that a TV series already have not located on the second plan after the projects. The paradox, but all the best have gone into television projects. If You need evidence, you ask Harrelson, McConaughey, Farrell, Scorsese and Allen. All confirm, even under swear a TV series now on a different level than it was before. Now, it — top-level. What more proof — this series. The series worthy of respect and view.

Of 9 10

American history is truly rich in multiple events mandatory be the center of public attention even in many other countries. If example, important and the global significance of events or the personal lives of individual celebrities. That once again and this proves the series is created by Ryan Murphy. Eminent "newsman" Ryan Murphy remained true to himself and his style. The most, issuing a the audience still one "series-Antologia". When after the call to the genre of horror movies as in "American horror story" and youth slasher as in the "Queens of scream", Murphy decided to master the genre of legal Thriller and did their job just fine.

It is safe to say that we are one of the strongest television news this year, each new series where I look at literally with a sinking heart. The main reason — scandalous trial charges double homicide, which was filed popular athlete, actor and just the darling of America OJ. Simpson. It would seem that people are familiar with the trial lasted for one year to catch viewing of this series is nothing but it is incorrect and premature to comment. So as the end of the series Ryan Murphy has a wealth of elements that surprise, catch and fascinate in the 10 episodes of the first season.

Can not to delight, with a documentary thoroughness Murphy immerses the viewer in the epicenter of this litigation. At this maximum volume, objectively and deeply revealing of what is happening not only the camp charges, but and protection. Moreover, utilizing a huge number of characters on the screen while developing the history of each of them lousy in common tangle of events in the end. When each item has its own weight, and each character has its purpose and all this is watched with a sinking heart. Simplifies the task and that many legal terms and subtleties are given to the viewer in the most simplified form, and the final season despite the objectivity of the creators, yet gives significant hints about the main question. Did Oh really a brutal murder ? The unequivocal answer does not get nothing but obvious one thing becomes clear. Sometimes even having a concrete evidence and proof, justice and not true is able to triumph. When how many tricks, hanging noodles on the ears, oratorical skills and just the charm of protection is able to "otmazatsya" from the deserved punishment of even the guilty.

The main stars of the show are definitely Cuba Gooding Jr. and Sarah Paulson. Gooding played a prominent and strong role as a minimum last 10 years of his life. They are going to play very naturally and the most emotionally. So and complicating the task of determining personally for yourself whether the blame his OJ. Oh really. When Paulson in fully revealed on screen, a powerful acting talent by how skillfully cope with such a complex, deep and controversial character on the screen. So well, a damn good tandem of actors John Travolta and Courtney B. Vance, each of which easily played the most visible party on the screen. Especially Sarah Paulson, which gave a truly powerful game in this series.

An interesting element of the series is selection of secondary actors, which in the literal sense consists of enough familiar faces Bruce Greenwood, Nathan lane, Jordana Brewster, Larry king, Connie Britton, Selma Blair and many others. Except that the former "Friends" star David Schwimmer played a frankly weak and throughout the season, went with a dull pathetic expression. Although it is possible, even in that the real Robert Kardashian himself not a helluva lot of noticeable personality. Except that, in the father of the scandalous daughters Kardashian in led Kim Kardashian. The most striking thing is how perfectly chosen the actors, who the hell and authentic similar to their real prototypes.

of 10 10

American crime story — this is a unique creative victory of "television" Ryan Murphy and perhaps one of the strongest TV products of the year. A very solid, exciting, intriguing, very interesting and professionally executed project with great potential, the implementation of which on screen can not delight to impress.

"It was really". This thought left me on the entire series. And even though the authors have come up with emotions, dialogues and many scenes, but the whole situation, a set of clues and replica court — just take with mind. "It was really". The rare case when you can see Idiocracy not in 1000 stupefaction, and today, here, near, in 1995.

It seems to me that the main problem lies in the system of selection of jurors. Because the arguments of the Prosecutor were delivered flawlessly. And protection was based solely on the emotional indirect counter-arguments. And hence the decision of the jury evidence not that the judicial system is rotten, or the Prosecutor was sloppy. It indicates that the jury were recruited people who are not able to think clearly. As if we have invited young children of the murderer and asked them to say maniac Pope to the death penalty. If the system of selection of jurors is not have changed significantly with the times then the entire judicial system on deep bottom.

I was surprised by the public reaction. They after all had access to heard the court knew about the evidence the it stood for release.

When the season started, then I can understand what is there to tell? The evidence to face first series was perceived as the artificial elongation of the timing, but the next was story, the stronger events were delayed in itself. For the level of absurdity and inadequacy of the growing up with each new series. And most importantly, prosecutors gave it an adequate rating, adequate response, adequate arguments on all this nonsense. So I makes no sense then repeat blame approach advocates, it was mentioned in the series. But the action continued I knew despite all of this, the essence of the crime is not will change. I was sure about this, not yet have heard the verdict of the jury.

Well, this is evolution. If we want common sense has continued to evolve, we need such cases of complete nonsense. Need to learn how to them not to repeat them in the future. If the American judicial system has made adequate findings and improved methods of selection of the jury, then losing battle went to people on benefit. If not... then it is the death of common sense. Tomorrow you will kill you on the street some psycho and let him go only because he's a good actor, famous, or good family men, or invented some cool thing, or just because he's prettier than you. What's the difference facts evidence?

After watching, I sat in lost not me left with one thought, "It was really". It was indeed...

Of 9 10