Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead

Group of people are trapped in the woods of West Virginia, where they are forced to fight for their lives against a group of vicious and horribly ugly cannibals.

  • Declan O'Brien

Release Date: 2009-10-20
IMDb icon 4.6/10
  • Country: DE, US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $3,000,000
Kala Jefferson
24 October 2009 | 02:36

Watch this misery happened in the company of friends, they were hoping to be scared at least one... but in vain.

From the first minute you begin to feel that the film is cheap, the actors talking shit, trick photography is laughable, the special effects are worthless, the ketchup flows like water, the plot sucked from finger looks like at the sham...

It is better to shoot melodramatic serials.

Sorry for the time spent!

Lorain Turtle
18 January 2010 | 10:13

It is unknown whether to further exploit the success of the Thriller-horror film "Turn not there", which in a sense continued the work of "Texas chainsaw massacre". But despite the deteriorating with each new film the quality of performances, history they make fun and even interesting. In the original cannibal mutants were saved by an ordinary man and a girl, who just happened to be lucky and strong spirit. In the sequel, which clearly turned in the direction of thrash metal, have was as the gouging of the ordinary, so and the military. The massacre had a different meaning. — just more blood and pieces of meat, and is as you know, like it is not all. Trikvel to fortunately, a little give the brakes and placed somewhere in the middle — less mindless dismemberment and more human factors.

This time into the woods to hospitable cannibals got prisoners the bus was wrecked, as usually a Hollywood blockbuster. In this is the interest of the third part — against the remaining in the living mutant savage made the same savages, only less capable and tenacious. Particularly pleased with the main villain is a prisoner, who then cuts to right and left, with hand get absolutely innocent "fellow travelers". Actually, I like these scenarios — when the lead roles are not good guys, notorious villains who all on a side, but eventually they will not go unpunished. In this case, if not crazy convicts, "Turn not there 3" do not there should look.

Plus film and that became more realistic. People here are not cut in half with a single blow and throw a huge grind, the audience saw the stuffing in the entire screen. On the whole the film is somewhat unfortunate hostages trying to escape as from ex-prisoners, so and two forest freaks with axes and traps. Not lucky, especially considering the main villain is constantly out of yourself kills all who that there is trying to do. Cannibals have the opportunity, though soon there is only one to accomplish the act of vengeance. Removed all that's pretty funny and not particularly bloody, to the same on casting scored very beautiful girls. So how entertainment non-pop horror film, "Turn not to 3", even only once.

In my opinion — good Thriller-horror film on one viewing. Worse than the original "Twist", but something better it trash the sequel.

Blancha Clardy
01 November 2009 | 11:12

Watched this "masterpiece"...Well, that say: the mass of impressions, but, to all they are bleak. The whole shooting team just want to spit in the face this incredible kukafka. Like the story they came up with more or less original, brought something new to one of parts (now of Hannibal runs not a bunch of dumb American teenagers (although it is also running), and to save his own skin trying a bunch of pumped-cons, greedy money), but the name of the movie just tempted even once to he could see it (still the third part of the acclaimed horror!). But all so miserably shot that just the censorship of words is not pick up.

Most horror movies certainly amaze hackneyed plot, "stamped" scenes and different blunders. But some of them try at least due to a little bit of famous actors to withdraw from a number of "cheap". In same you will not see not a single familiar face. The feeling that the actors picked up on the street and only pity. On the duration of the film, it was a feeling that the main character of the dumplings cool down the house, and she quickly wants Srul with set — as the expression on her face portrayed indifference to the shooting process.

The presence of shoals in the film simply amazing! Stuntmen are visible everywhere, where only you; the blood on bodies why then pink reminiscent of raspberry jam; cartridges in guns not end (a shot they a great number of times) until the moment when you have to shoot the main cannibal's head; and so stupid and hackneyed remarks and actions of the main characters just cause hysterical LAUGHTER!

The only positive thing for fans of this genre of movie — the abundance of blood, meat and the naked skull of the human brain!

3 of the 10

How much did it cost to make Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $3,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead?
This tv-show was directed by Declan O'Brien.
What is the genre of Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Horror.
Who starred in Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Tom Frederic, Janet Montgomery, Gil Kolirin, Christian Contreras, Jake Curran.
What is Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 4.6.
When was Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2009-10-20.