Toy Story 3

Remember how cool it was when in 1995 he published the first "toy Story"? Now CG toons rivet all who do not too lazy, even in Russia, make on the conveyor. And then CG it was a breakthrough, a revolution in the technology of animation, "History" remained almost not the only projects in its kind of up to 2000. the Kids were just stunned. Remember saw the trailer for the English channel, Cartoon Netwrok (caught plate), but couldn't look up in theaters have me the play to it is not reached, but the Internet is not been almost anywhere. Had to wait a year.

The cartoon struck me. Made really revise related to the toys. I treated it gently, with care, tried not to scatter, to always clean up after the game. Younger children along with the belief in Santa Claus began to believe that the toys come to life until they none sees. I cried a few times! Once during the scene with"flight" buzz through the window, not lying, honest to God, it was touching, sad and heroic. Then revised. Modern CG-Handicrafts such as Shrek force children to let the tears of empathy or to reconsider the attitude to the surrounding world? Yes well, no of course! On they go neighing and to devour, so watch in 3D. And "toy Story" touched...

In the "History" is raised very adult philosophical problems in a clear and close the child shell. For example, the existential question buzz, which was to understand what it is not a true hero, just someone's toy of plastic. As he tried to fly, watched the commercials yourself on TV and watched the inscription "Made in Taiwan" from under the socket. Or a very grown-up topics like the guy who experimented on the toys, then it looked abruptly Strogg from "Quake IV" and the necromorphs of"Dead Space", the blood froze.

In the third part again rise rather complex and multifaceted issues. To understand toys, owner has increased goes to College (similar to uni us), so I put you to sit on the attic, and then veginet will agree, is quite the challenge. And again the stream of existentialism. And, in many ways humor is not absorbs story problems (as obicei happens in 95% of modern cartoons).

Must watch.

Well, today saw the cartoon Toy Story, up to that watched both of the preceding part of this! Very good and cute cartoon, but part 3, it just magical cartoon. Feelings unusual, I immediately thought about the fate of his toys, which I have served.

Most impressive in the film, what is happening with buzz Lightyear! A delightful one where the Database accepts the old settings and becomes a Spanish Macho! So graceful, a real Spaniard!

During the viewing of this cartoon I felt like a child! Felt himself equal to those who sat in the front, back and asked, "Mom, you and why bear bad?" In the end I thought going to cry, because really, toy — our real friends are!

A huge thank you Walt Disney & Pixar!

I am surprised how many people appreciate the products of Pixar on the level of masterpieces, while in fact Pixar's artisans movie. Not the artists, no.. that's right, they take the recipe template, high quality mixed Packed with hand and boredom dumped on the counter. Why is it so it turns out that none their movies are not leaves any deep impression behind? Looked up and said in unison "credit" and forgot. Felt boundless hypocrisy, the emptiness of these inflated high scores. Yes, but nothing but the has a strong movie that causes waves of discussion, differing opinions, creates movement around him. Not afraid even to speak, fan clubs the topic. And that will produce fan club this "toy story"? Yes, I looked all parts. even managed not to fall asleep.. But you know, the second or God forbid third time to look I will even if I pay extra. And of course not going to look for additional materials, download the audio tracks, to buy books on the subject, to wait with impatience the release of the DVD.

But let us consider the "toy story". So and see gray the Manager of the Department of solves complex question — "how we would make money on a kid's movie?" And slowly rotating from his head gear — "what do kids love?.. toys.. So film with talking plastic toys.. Add template techniques-lost and found toys.. Checked the intrigue of new to the group.. the Bunny threw hostess.. Doll-Masha-doll-Misha.. Writer Ko me!!" And here's the thing, for plastic toys is not get any which side. No animation, no realistic nor the acting, "Yes, it is the same toys!" — tell anyone to protection. And more or less sane animations, mediocre if you move it obviously at any living object, will perceive with delight in the style of "my God, they did make like alive!"

I do not understand how such a film may occupy the same space with others, where generated by different universe, your world and not a rip-off of the room my grandson. Including including characters.

The third part pedaliruet the laminated fat a rut the first two, far-fetched and not logical attachment of the possessed toys to their owners.. Toy villains, under the blueprint.. the Plastic personality of the characters, carefully copied in that time. And of course pink happy end. God is mine, at least one would be the highlight was in the film, at least a grain of salt in this sterile product conveyor, sharpened to the breaking points. Same thing with humor. Not know you, I laugh not pulled, as well as and my nephew that sat made sounds is that Pokrovka, in unison with the silent hall Packed full of children. Small fees Russia, you say? And more on this film and didn't deserve it. Time to get your children and to forget. But better to keep them on nature, or these money to buy them real toys,  play in the evening together.

I am fully aware that my opinion on this formulaic movie will sink in the sea is not less formulaic rave, the film just focuses on a sterile high scores to deal with this pointless, as well as with surf. One sad that the more successful such projects in the reluctantly, the producers will take a chance with new bright concepts and steriline will become a movie in General. And forbid God "toys" frustrate Oscar, all well I hope that art lovers in the officiating dominated and unable to distinguish art from craft.