Thor: Ragnarok


Returning to Asgard in search of the mysterious enemy, leading the hunt for the Infinity Stones, Thor discovers that his brother Loki who seized the throne of Asgard, led to the approach of the most terrible events of Ragnarok. According to legend, this marks the last battle of Asgard, the effect of which will be its complete destruction. In an attempt to prevent this event the Torah have to resort to the help of his fellow Avengers the Hulk. Together, they have to be face to face with the worst enemy of all nine worlds — the fiery demon Arturom, whose goal is the fulfillment of the prophecy of Ragnaroke and the destruction of the nine worlds.

Director:
  • Taika Waititi

Stars:
Release Date: 2017-11-03
IMDb icon 7.9/10
  • Country: AU, US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $180,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $853,977,126
reviews
Maressa Yseulte
10 November 2017 | 10:29

A bit of history. My acquaintance with the Torus, as in General, acquaintance with actor Chris Hemsworth, began with the first solo album. So thought this is not the best film of one of the best (for lack of a better word) franchises I looked first, conceding a solo movie on the Hulk and the Iron man film series. And even though he the film is then, in 2011, left behind mixed feelings, the main character hooked me literally from the first minute. The thing that I'm interested in the mythology of Ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome, but Norse mythology has always been for me something difficult, mysterious and grim. And then I see a movie with the name "Thor" and realize main character in this is the Scandinavian God of thunder. "An excellent opportunity to meet with legends of Scandinavia," — I thought. So started my with kynoselen marvel.

Sorry for the offtopic. Now directly on the triquel. He is incomparable. At this review you would and finish. In all, according to my humble opinion, should contain Kinomax marvel: colorful characters, action and humor. And humor — one strengths of film, and in contrast the sequel to Guardians of the galaxy, where jokes the last third of the movie is more annoying than fun (IMHO), here it from the first minute and before the end of the last scene after the credits (spoiler: they are two, although you so know it) forces the viewer if not laughing, then at least to cause a sincere smile. The film's Director, Taika of Waititi, wonderful "Real vampires" which I had the privilege to watch a few weeks ago, managed to create something incredible with the final part of the trilogy of the Torah, making it very colorful, fun and driving, do not much of this departing from the canons of the comic book, but rather altering it. And I think there anything bad, because the stories told in the comics of yesteryear it is inconvenient to move on a large screen, sometimes it impossible or very costly, at least — just not interested. Here Director, rethinking a little bit the source, could you show us not just the Torah, which we have never seen, but the Torah, which we deserve.

The overall plot of the film we learned to trailers: hela, goddess of death, decides to capture the Asgard, and God of thunder, along with the newly formed team ("team Thor, of course" — who watched the sketch-trailers "Ragnarok", the appreciate) her needs to prevent. In Norse mythology, Ragnarok (or Ragnarok) — this is the death of the gods and around the world. Not want to spoil, let me just say that marvel loves to play with names of movies like with "the Civil war".

I want to note the installation of the film. Who likes kinokomedii, the remembers the trailers to the film "Batman vs. Superman", after which there was a feeling that you have watched a movie. If after watching the trailer of "Thor" from you had similar feelings, know — the picture often will you to surprise. What loved it, so is that some of the scenes shown in the trailers, in the film look a little different: you see the scene shown in the trailer, but in a different location or changed details, and it's really great. In General, the twists in here is, they are many they are interesting.

The characters — the main highlight of the final chapters of"the strongest avenger." And I'll start, perhaps, with the God of thunder. It is a completely new character, not like the hero of the previous films. And not because he lost Mjollnir and long hair. Has changed dramatically and the nature of the asgardian, his world view and, finally, a sense of humor. Thor throughout the film is constantly cracking jokes! Thor! Jokes! Remember, when tor so joking KVM? Here I don't remember. The change obviously did good. And is closer to to fully understand what the mighty God — a worthy son of his father, ready to take the throne of Asgard. Nothing more to say — see for yourself.

The Hulk and Loki. Hulk in "Ragnarek" did much more than in all his early solo albums. Mark Ruffalo again personally took part in the motion capturing and lost this is fine. Long stay Bruce Benner in the image of the green monster not without the effects of the Hulk learned to speak and restrain his fury (when it's not comes gladiatorial fights), but it behaves as a child. And over the Hulk, as strange as it sounds, you will probably laugh the most. Loki also — typical God deception all the ensuing consequences. He always intrigues and annoys superheroes and the Torah in particular, why marvel universe has often suffered, but even he is not devoid of doubt in their nature, so it image in this film develops, and the role is much more significant than before. And the emotion of Tom Hiddleston in a hero Mark Ruffalo deserve and the Golden Oscar.

The talented cate Blanchett played the main villain, but he character for me, revealed not to end.

Very pleased with Broomhilda in the performance of Tessa Thompson. Yes, not Canon, yeah not Caucasian, blond Valkyrie and other "Yes, Yes, Yes", but what's the difference? The actress coped with the role brilliantly. And although after watching the trailers it seemed that it is an extra character in this story, in the film, she looks harmonious together with the main characters.

We should also mention the Heimdall Idris Elba (though not armor not the Rainbow Bridge, but all good), Skarga (in my opinion, a very interesting character), embodied by Karl urban, Korga, played by Waititi and a cameo of Stephen Strange, which brings us ever closer to unite the characters in the following parts of "the Avengers". Well and the Grandmaster, all the eccentricity and oddity which is so masterfully conveyed Jeff Goldblum, became a real discovery in the film and without it, the picture is not would be rich and integrated.

The only cons that I found themselves, are weak special effects in some scenes (for example, when hela destroys the Mjollnir) and sometimes short action scene (after all wanted to have their there were more), but all the disadvantages pale in comparison to the background one big advantage, which is "Thor: Ragnarok".

Summary: the movie came out more than decent. I believed with all my heart in him the day it just announced my expectations with more than justified. Many more things I want to say, but review so it was very big, so my rating

9.5 10

P. S. the Battle of Thor with the army of the Hela under the song Led Zeppelin — Immigrant Song — it is something! Still at home — run in movie!

Elvira Sclater
22 November 2017 | 12:01

Now a few weeks in the rental is booming the third part of the adventures of the Scandinavian God of lightning and his half brother-a potential villain. Actually, Marvel studios has set a record in this year, releasing three of the film, instead of traditionally two. Although, on account of spider-man is debatable, but the track Marvel then visible for kilometers.

Everyone who is a little bit familiar with products MCU, understands in what niche does this Studio. Finding the perfect formula for his paintings, Kevin Feige clearly defined the vector of development as a entire Studio and films, published under her early Comedy and lighter content. And it would be foolish to assume that another film from Marvel will be released from the "comfort zone". So happened, and rather not nothing happened: Thor was not a revelation, but has been the standard project where humor prevails over all the rest (that's the surprise).

Style Ragnarok is the same Guardians of the galaxy, ranging from colours ending dublinbarista secondary characters. And if humor, want not want, but has to be considered, the questions to the rest of the stay.

Against their fellow superheroes at the shop, Thor turned out to be too naive, teenage movie where the missing something hint drama. Story sagging here to max closed jokes, no a clear interaction of the characters on the second plan: they flat pressed as a result, over them interesting to watch. The scene with Hulk, which are supposedly funny, but the output is just funny.

It is clear that the Thor was filmed on the basis of commercial considerations, but only for this? Why shoot a sequel, which does not move nor the franchise nor the very kynoselen forward, and only inhibits it? Especially strange as it looks, given that the Thor is a film the third phase, where all events are preceded by the war of infinity. But in the story there is references, why the film stands out from all of kynoselen, as if not affiliated with her.

Thor:Ragnarok is showing that MCU not want to experiment and produce something new for themselves. So not wants even using the basis of the events of Ragnarok, of the that could make a serious apocalyptic picture(and Ragnarok is nothing the Norse end of the world, telling the destruction of all mankind and the universe, and about the death of Odin, Thor, Loki and others), the Studio made another frivolous Comedy-fantasy. A pity, such potential was.

Going to the viewer, Marvel with each time more deprive their films of individuality, turning them in soulless, disposable pacifiers, and Thor clear evidence of this.

6 from 10

Leonore Dustie
07 November 2017 | 11:56

Probably the best solo on the Hulk. And prelude the film can serve as a phrase entrenched in the head from the trailer of the film: "Hulk raging fire, and the Thor smoldering". As it in description IMDb genres of film labeled? Fantasy, action and then Comedy? And that no, a Comedy should shift almost not the first role...

Looks like marvel decided to make up for all your not very good project and put all my creativity, power and there they still is (?) in"Ragnarok," and I can say with certainty, they did it. "Thor" starts out easy and casual and this easy steps with you for two hours, which is a film. Sparkling humor of God of lightning flashing here, there, that before he Arturom in chains humor, then a Gladiator on the field trying to reach out through humor to the Hulk. Loki, by the way, from him the Torah, is also not lagging behind in terms of humor. A phrase: "Ahhh, this is my friend work" just fly away!

The picture is incredibly colorful. However, when the marvel had other pictures? And the phrase "wow" and"wow" to this film is quite appropriate.

The sound and the sound, again, thanks to marvel, they know how to pick the music to his films and you begin to involuntarily shake my head in the beat of the main theme of the film, and after you leave and continue to sing.

The plot? Yes here marvelou endless field for activities.

Well, certainly scene cameo by Stan Lee, thank you father

Of 9 10

faq
How much has Thor: Ragnarok made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $853,977,126.
How much did it cost to make Thor: Ragnarok?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $180,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Thor: Ragnarok?
This tv-show was directed by Taika Waititi.
What is the genre of Thor: Ragnarok?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure, Fantasy, Best Action Movies 2017, Best Adventure Movies 2017, Best movies 2017, Best Fantasy & Sci-fi Movies 2017.
Who starred in Thor: Ragnarok?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Idris Elba, Cate Blanchett, Tom Hiddleston, Benedict Cumberbatch, Chris Hemsworth.
What is Thor: Ragnarok IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.9.
When was Thor: Ragnarok released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2017-11-03.