The Simpsons Movie

After Homer dumped wastes in reservoir, Springfield declared a quarantine area and covered giant glass dome, and local residents took up arms against the Simpsons because they are cut off from the rest of the world...

  • David Silverman

Release Date: 2007-07-27
IMDb icon 7.3/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $75,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $536,414,270
Blythe Tally
16 August 2007 | 06:38

The simpsons is loved by all: pupils, students, adults. The creators of the animated series is, of course, known, so the decision to create a full-screen version — win-win with a commercial point of view the decision. The simpsons will pay off quickly and will bring considerable profit. But from another point of view — it is not the the Simpsons that we have long loved.

The beginning of the cartoon, I very much. That already a favorite melody in the beginning, a couple of interesting jokes, yeah and to speak, just kind of a favorite characters on the big screen. But through the floor hours was starting to seem like better it was another short TV series.

The euphoria of the views of the inhabitants of Springfield on the big screen disappeared, and became clearly evident that the jokes are old, even in some measure predictable. Too much in cartoon "emotional" scenes-a romantic conversation of Homer and Marge, Homer snot the reason of separation from family and it is absolutely silly looks liking Bart to ned Fladers and desire to become his son. Well, not the same he Bart to really.

Very very stupid, unfunny and predictable, looks like the episode with the Shaman and not even will save the questionable phrase in Homer, "Thanks, sugar Tits"!

The ending is severely tightened and again full of snot — I least before dying I want to feel what it's like to have a father. Be my son, Bart. Homer: "give me another chance, son. Brrrr..... And in the original "the simpsons" had similar moments, but not same number.

In my opinion, the atmosphere and humor of the cartoon creators to save failed, it's them the main task. But still worth a look, because in front of us again favorite characters and a couple of interesting jokes there!

6 from 10

Corenda Odysseus
16 August 2007 | 03:56

After vague trailers, teasers, yeah and anyway, the General trend failure polnometrazhek known cartoon, much to expect from "the Simpsons" is not necessary. But the campaign in the movie is completely refuted initial impression — the picture is just wonderful!

The true spirit of "the Simpsons" perfectly transferred to the big screen: it is filled with a variety of humor that can make laugh anyone. A little pumped up Russian translation — the legendary "do h" like and many other invariable attributes of the series look dull.

But if we ignore quibbles — the movie was a success!

Of 9 10

Celie Darcee
23 January 2009 | 01:56

When I heard that "the Simpsons" will release in the feature-length version, knew that will be a cinema one of the first in principle happened. The cartoon brought a lot of good experiences and fun, but... it was the "but"! It seemed that "the Simpsons" unfinished or it just was competent commercial move to get more money, which is like left "at", but still not those are "the Simpsons", which I wanted to see!

But all were the desire to revise the cartoon to once again verify the solution was that it has changed in the root, of course, best.

About two hours ago I reviewed the "Simpsons in cinema", and throughout the cartoon I was not the feeling of the "first viewing", all in first time laughed jokes (humor in"the simpsons" has always been good tone), carefully and with great interest watched and tracked all the issues raised (by the way, a lot), "worried" for family, on seen glad that they are, in General, I realized then the cinema (at the premiere), I was in the atmosphere so some things I didn't catch (such never happened but the less...), although it is the cartoon, but it funny and serious at the same time, social and considering many important issues, and it has always been!

The plot of the cartoon is not monotonous, humor is still the same sparkling that as for the topic, "problems", then all right. And, by the way, the eternal problem with sequels and sequels of series a full-length version, respectively, in the worse, not treat  the"Simpsons in cinema", on the contrary, it is a wonderful feature-length continuation of the legendary animated series, but in the same time, David Silverman and his team managed to make it in a sense, a new and fresh, and also able to please everyone and each!

The bottom line: I advise everyone to watch this cartoon, indifferent not will be no!

PS Not like to grade, but in this case, no doubt:

10 of 10

How much has The Simpsons Movie made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $536,414,270.
How much did it cost to make The Simpsons Movie?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $75,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie The Simpsons Movie?
This tv-show was directed by David Silverman.
What is the genre of The Simpsons Movie?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Adventure, Comedy, Animation.
Who starred in The Simpsons Movie?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Dan Castellaneta, Julie Kavner, Nancy Cartwright, Yeardley Smith, Hank Azaria.
What is The Simpsons Movie IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.3.
When was The Simpsons Movie released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2007-07-27.