All somehow believe that if you do high art, it is necessary to do it the most tedious. Usually the authors of all have any conscience and in addition to nusta and, in fact, "high art" (TM), something the film put. Here have rejected any kinship with the mass culture and put beyond what is necessary for festivals highbrow critics nothing.
Disgusting drawn cartoon. Terrible not only negative is the king and the cops, but and positive shepherdess and the chimney sweep, and the narrator Mockingbird. They all terrible, vypasne of the Cabinet of curiosities. For some reason, again, it is believed that illustration in adults need to draw in the most repulsive manner. That children do not accidentally look what you?
So, we endure an hour and a half of terrible games, where the meaning half. The rest — all sorts of lengthy moments, here the king of long rides on the Elevator, so on the roofs for a long time wandering heroes. Tarkovsky-style. And any reference bordering plagiarism, for example, to ancient German silent "Metropolis". By the way, here is there an underground city — it was cool, because the film. And draw something can anyone of the same robot the size city.
Semantic content. Hmm. I Saw one article where quite convincingly, with arguments, came the idea that the main villain here — Mockingbird, he wily provocateur, especially izvergnulsya state in abyss spitting on human victims may — a foreign agent of influence. The cartoon also. his serve rather alludes to a more straightforward and familiar interpretation, who is a bad (king), who is a good (Mockingbird). What I wanted to say to the authors? On my opinion, they just wanted to get smart and show everyone how they are in your cinema guys. Standard stroke truck — you a lot of meanings and ideas that are contrary to each other, and themselves with it to understand. "I'm so I see." In any case, what about the new revolution? It causes, effects, pros and its cons have long known (which, of course, prevents people from constantly stepping on the same rake, is another question).
In fact, critics job to watch movies-not-for-all and something the subject to invent, they that get the money. See also free — enjoy below average.
4 of 10
