
Three hours and a half — may it is made for the provocation. But the face of the character De Niro on the fourth hour of the picture accidentally (Li) expressed the tired of the film that had accumulated this side of the screen. At this all the same movie as talking to bartenders about drinks, — beverage. Not say that totally say that uninteresting. "The cumulative effect of parts", which was generated from viewer's words Scorsese, accident (s) included in itself, fatigue.
More about the cons. A lot of characters. Many timlines. Yes, they are only three, but they and timline that tend to move, and move different dynamics and have different impacts on the characters. More precisely on their age. Or rather to influence. More precisely, at least have to affect the appearance of age (the arch that they still as a bagel). And coupled with intentional (this time just by chance!) feature of the film that the actors have played some of their ages — it becomes difficult for perception. It is the additional weight of the film, especially when there are still here these all sorts of trade unions: first, second, roofing, transport; cell three-digit numbers, in different cities. I wanted to put on pause at least a little googling that is this cell. Intuitively, of course, it is clear that it is like nothing on the film is not affect. But everyone has a different threshold of unimportance. And for a better perception of the world want to know these mechanisms.
The less presents textilenet effect your of course gave. Maybe that's it? Three the timeline, striving for the climax. A cumulative effect. Yeah.
About the film. All done well there. In addition to rejuvenation. No, stocks graphics, which many complain, no. But it's not enough. In youth character simply does not believe it. Like De Niro in stage "of their youth" went on the truck 50 years. And is with God knows (and does not matter) from nowhere to the young wife. And then it turns out that we want to show the development of character, character years thirty, returned from the war. But we still don't know. Because and here, seemingly, the timeline number one is, and at some point becomes the beginning of the timeline number two, we AsParallel shown to this. Showed the scene as characters walking and De Niro cute indulge in some nostalgic memories: "Oh, but I remember our first meeting at this filling — Oh really. this, that so a coincidence!". Yes. But the actors are there: the character Hiking — okay, older. Character De Nero — almost (that word may be crossed out) same. And all old people. That whether life, whether the film. It so the plan. And what they there vnutriporovogo time has passed — how much? Ten years? Twenty? Hell if I know. What is clear is that De Niro everywhere under one of the other De Niro, very old man, the author-narrator in the nursing home. In short uncomfortable. And again, these of the cell. 299. 368. The trade unions. Here it! He became someone in the Union. Or in the cell. Most important! This is the dramatic scene is something like giving power and responsibility from the character to al Pacino to character De Niro. It seems that now the story will be released on a new level, because the main character goes on a new level and will solve the problems of the new level. And.. don't feel this weight. Because showed only one scene where he this position is not noble took a bribe. Apparently, in the last scenes of the last timeline on his coffin with the seller to bargain. All. Character De Niro after, apparently, a major destination also continued to "paint the walls" (to the end of the film the phrase takes on a banal hackneyed ottenok), i.e., the President of the cell or something there — continued to murder. A bit illogical: there, damn, a mafia Pantheon, why have a lot of things to prove to the wolf to do a chore? It also not like:"gene deer decided to see how running it Department shows how to handle the broom". We are talking now not about the murder plot [spoiler] and about an ordinary murder, for example, the character of glasses. Someone will say that the events of the film based on a true story. For God's sake, but let it from a different angle, open that can this character like to shoot or rather — he at some moment of doubt in their actions. But it is not. Therefore, arch (arches?) — bagel. A good or bad — each decides for himself. Well even the jury for the awarding of statuettes. So that the weight in dramatic scenes a little. But the film is not bad. Look under the old fashion can. And lots of ice — to melt he can be long. Three and a half hours, man. The case when happy, wondering what this movie captions certainly not ten, at least fifteen minutes.
7 of 10