The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day

The last 8 years the brothers lived together with his father on a farm in the backwoods of Ireland. One day their uncle tells them about the rumors that they are involved in the murder of a Catholic priest in Boston. The boys returned to Boston to clean up its bad reputation, and find people who framed them.

Director:
  • Troy Duffy

Stars:
Release Date: 2009-12-11
IMDb icon 6.3/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English | Italian | Spanish
  • Budget: $8,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $10,629,321
reviews
Eadith Tracay
28 May 2015 | 08:54

Ungrateful this matter — sequels to shoot. Seriously, you have you ever heard that the sequel to whatever he had it turned out fine, they said, "Yes, that it fit the film, not worse than the first"? Extremely rare. And if usually the bitter hatred of the fans is flavored sickly charges, then the Braves Troy Duffy and not that went.

Although I (you can consider me narrow-minded) so not know what the second "Saints" not accounted for the yard. I dare say there are a couple of moments, they even win by compared to the first part, which in General, of course, unattainable, beautiful and all that. I like that the family history of MacManus became deeper (although where their venerable mother, the story is more silent). Like the gloomy atmosphere — color that whether, become darker. But still — Yes, Yes, hell, Romeo makes me more likes than Rocco. The reasons for such lasciviousness are: first, Rocco killed the cat. CAT. If someone is suddenly not enough, here's second: it constant tantrums were taken out of this, and third: that to the illumination of the brothers he somehow does not disdain to work for the mafia, he also do not doing. So that rest with the world, Rocco Viva La Romeo.

The soundtrack has changed, but I might say that he got worse. Some songs moved to my tracklist, yeah so there and left. In these detached Irish melodies felt a recklessness, a kind of desperate fun, especially in the "To Better Days". However, when she heard suddenly the theme from the first part, direct faster heart beat.

Outline of the plot is about the same, only with a large part of the magnificent Duce. But there should mention the main disadvantage of — minusische, I would say — the second part, as follows: special agent Eunice bloom. Lord, Eunice bloom — Yes the teacher can call, but not the cool aunt of the FBI! And her appearance, manners? It will not fit. No sense to try to make it is something impressive, if the actress speaks the obvious with the air of someone who reads aloud the contents of the Book Secrets of the presidents of the United States, still here. so. parts. words like periclase trying to impress peers. It beautiful, Yes, but it's past. Short-term appearance of Willem Dafoe — as a balm on the soul.

Well, ending — dark, leaving lots of room for speculation, because I think we will ever see a sequel, but still inspiring.

The rest — Yes, we have the Trinity of man-boob-police are wonderful, though battered, brothers MacManus and a lot of fun bloody madness.

In conclusion, I would advise to look Director's cut — like me, she looks more coherent.

Arielle LaRue
23 February 2010 | 10:34

The continuation of the cult film, shot in hardly big money the same Director with almost entirely original composition inspired hope that the movie will turn out the same cool as the original. And get a good movie. Why?

Much the only weak spot — plot. Attempts to create some intrigue in the beginning was killed 5 minutes later. Except that much is unclear, the writer (and in combination directed by Troy Duffy) planted many uninteresting scenes, it is not clear why extended good, added banal phrases and stupid jokes.

The whole movie is a play on the fun and memorable moments from the first part, but here is done badly. Good mix of humor and drama, it was probably a feature of the first part, here is a joke almost the whole movie. But in the movie the moment it is the story of Il Duce. And finally, starting from the final shooting and all — it was great. When did the titles, I just cheering!

The camera work is not very pleased — painfully close-up takes camera shooting quiet scenes, but works fine in time of action-and. Claims to the acting is almost there — the exception is Clifton Collins Jr., who plays Romeo — not very convincing. And finally, no claim to music — the soundtrack has turned out a strong and unforgettable.

Of course, after such a fantastic (this is a compliment) of the film wanted something more at least the same level — 10 years had the creators of the sanding! Now the film definitely meets its budget, slightly crossing the line category B. But even I completely satisfied, after all could be and is worse. And it was a good movie. You right?

8 from 10

Keely Gerrie
15 February 2010 | 09:00

How I love the first part of this film. So I waited with impatience for the sequel. Even more fueled interest in the picture, the Prime Minister it was only for a closed circle of audience. How you know that what is hidden — delicious is in twice. And here — half a year of waiting has passed, and our valiant pirates put the picture in the Internet. For they — many thanks!

Just want to note that from a film I did not expect the same extravaganza that in the first part, and even more so the second part will surpass the previous one. Yeah and know that the only exceptions in the form of "Terminator" and  Saw — can the second part to the first plug for belt.

The film came out very good! The plot, say so, — mediocre; the plot, as such — may not always. Here it is — and then already no. Although the ending is, frankly, for me was a surprise... Yes, here for worth watching movies! Although there are the second side of the coin named "finale" — this is an ambiguous hint on continuation. Waiting for the third part? — of course... But like me — the third part is too much. Not a good movie to turn into sucks releasing new and the new part... but this happened — pretty often.

What can you highlight in the movie is — entry, the character of Romeo ("I like them on gay? — You like someone is friendly with them") and humor blame as just did this Mexican guy (in his role is the most successful in the film, as it seemed to me).

Blood, humor, drama and few things — provide the film a decent rating!

Thank you, Brothers, for 2 hours of interest.

8 from 10

faq
How much has The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $10,629,321.
How much did it cost to make The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $8,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day?
This tv-show was directed by Troy Duffy.
What is the genre of The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Crime, Thriller.
Who starred in The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Sean Patrick Flanery, Norman Reedus, Billy Connolly, Clifton Collins Jr., Julie Benz.
What is The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 6.3.
When was The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2009-12-11.