Star Trek Into Darkness


Back on Earth, the crew "enterprise" finds that the activities and principles of their organization undermined from within. Fleet bound inexplicable terror and lies dormant until the world is sinking deeper into the abyss. Captain kirk takes over leadership of the operation to capture the villain responsible for this chaos and capable of destroying all of humanity. In a confusing game for life and death, love and friendship will be sacrificed for the sake of the only thing left in the Kirk — his team.

Director:
  • J.J. Abrams

Stars:
Release Date: 2013-05-16
IMDb icon 7.7/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English | Klingon
  • Budget: $190,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $467,365,246
reviews
Trudie Laurence
18 May 2013 | 02:50

I like to think that the most accurate of the original Star Trek Abrams can be described by the epithet "brave". From the main ideas to the most inconspicuous of ways of the incarnation, the film was soaked with freedom — if not audacity — interpretation of the popular universe. In addition, revealing the original was and synthesis of drama and blockbuster — in short, strap for the sequel was set very high.

Because there is nothing strange in that, like looking at its predecessor, Into Darkness for the beginning makes a significant step back. After as a bright, as and the tense opening scene captain kirk loses honoured in the first part of the title, it friendship again Mr. Spock is put under the blow, and instead of trolling fans of the series in this time the authors offer their tribute to film Star Trek 2. Of course, in the end, all this is planned Houdini-Abrams spectacular tying his hands — a few moments, and genuine surprise to the hall goes into the charm of the trick.

Fascinated and really have something: visually, the new Star Trek looks just gorgeous. From the sterile white of the bridge of the enterprise to the mysterious depths of the cosmos, from the quaint architecture of London on the twenty-third century to the beautiful Zooey Saldana and Alice Eve — Into Darkness not ceases to please the photoreceptors. For this film can be forgiven even outright quoting tidbits of the carpenter, the video game Dead Space.

No less impressive Into Darkness and delivered. Receiving the baton almost perfect balance between popkornom blockbuster and crafted drama from the original, the second part of the Star Trek demonstrates a fantastic job over the characters narrative. As a virtuoso at this is Sam Abrams: several times throughout the film he dramatically changes the focus from quiet conversations on the spectacular action, reaching a literally unique experience.

And, of course, caste. For four years Chris pine not have lost the abilities necessary for performance dedicated to the last paragraph trick, Zachary Quinto, it seems, succeed in the second time to impress Dr. Sheldon Cooper, and the rest of the crew of the enterprise though, and has not become more similar to their prototypes with blue screens, but anyway coped with your task for a solid five. Cumberbatch? Well as for a debut in Hollywood, perfectly with the point of view of acting, but, frankly, no special revelation.

In fact, the same thing I want to say about the General impressions from Star Trek: Into Darkness. Making not a digression in the prologue, the Director, the magician, in the end all managed to cause a storm of applause in the hall. However, for some reason it seems that this time the applause sounded rather address, and not him artist.

Kellia Loram
19 May 2013 | 07:24

Date 8 September 1966 without any exaggeration can be called great (especially for US citizens), because at this day American television channel NBC's premiere of the pilot episode space Opera "star trek", which initially does not bring any benefits to the TV channel sky-high ratings, but over time, the series managed to achieve audience recognition and to the much anticipated cult status. For almost half a century universe of "star trek" boasts twelve feature films, six TV series (including the animated series), hundreds of books and stories and also a huge number of video games. Despite the huge fan base, are unlikely to some would argue that until recently, "Star trek" had a very hard time breathing, feeding all the signs of clinical death. Perhaps nostalgic moments at the fans would be enough to keep Star Trek as in a coma, but fortunately, Paramount found a suitable defibrillator (J. J. Abrams), who four years ago was actually pulled hopeless patient with the world. The heart of the Abrams it launched, another job was to support him stable operation ("StarTrek: Retaliation"), although fresh cardiogram (critics ratings) of 2013 talking about that the resuscitator Abrams should improve as to Deputy chief (one of the main advisors of the big film studios, who oversees priority projects).

On the one hand, Abrams has established itself in the miraculous monument, because the sequel to "star trek" absorbed in all without exception, the cinematic elements of good summer blockbuster. Location, scenery, amazing special effects, large action scenes, plot twists, and powerful acting — there you have it, here is only all above is a weakly synchronized among themselves, as if the last time Abrams dropped the detonator, activating the universal smotribelnoy. Space subgenre is not be heavy in terms of perception, as for example fantasy, and the at least the uninitiated will be somewhat hard to understand at all the intricacies of what is happening on the screen events, so the possibilities check out the advanced press release distributors, a better yet, look for a specialized book is "star trek for dummies" to no clench my teeth every time when the crew members of the starship enterprise can communicate with each other almost not the language of Argo. According to the structure of the movie is not complex, there are specifics Star trek definitely gets its mark, but not drive in the shadow of the main story plot, to master which is not will be difficult adequate person who does not like to eat before a session "refreshments" (vodka, port, cognac) drinks. The main problem of "Retaliation" is the lack of innovative ideas, which took place in the first film Abrams. The Director was supposed to do something more than a standard blockbuster, Hollywood naphthalene using the formula in as a guideline, which is only does that it multiplies the ambitions of its predecessor: higher, stronger, cooler. The image is so powerful that the eyes sometimes need a long timeout, because the visual jumble in collaboration with too dark 3D-picture put on a real exam for view, to hold that it is possible only if you wear regular sunglasses instead of dedicated.

Star Trek Into Darkness — this large-scale space Opera, sensitivity and charm which is purely automatic in nature. Chris pine (kirk) and Zachary Quinto (Spock) has shown a good performance, because they are the Duo constantly pleasing mental confrontation (emotional vs cool), but pleased us most of all Benedict Cumberbatch (John Harrison), which more extensive elaboration of the character could I can count on  the"Oscar" nomination, although given the average age of the Academy and the specifics of the subgenre — it seems sci-Fi luxury.

6 from 10

Karina Veronike
16 September 2013 | 03:41

I love science fiction. Space and scientific well. I'm not a star Trek fan. Honestly once tried to look at, but not imbued with the idea. Apparently, I am or got to watch it not that age, or not born in the country well much what exactly does not are a nerd or a geek. Therefore, the film did not look as a continuation of the American space-fantastic mega-epic, which includes 12 feature hundreds of serial genovariants Saga, and as just a fan fiction fighters.

Yet, unfortunately the fashion for a fantastic space fighters some time ago, and a new good appear not too often. To the way, the previous feature film about the adventures of a team of enterprise I suddenly liked it. Although serial woodenness and pathos in this of course was present, but the scope, and entertainment touched my heart.

As for vengeance, the expectations something same the brave spirit proved only partly true.

For all its entertainment and a very worthy computer graphics, on my opinion the film is clearly not have enough scale that would look like a self-sufficient creation. The plot, as if has come loose from context her full-length picture is part of the series. Of course in the whole it is. And fans of the Saga will surely be satisfied. But me how not a fan, yet you want something more detailed and more, shall we say, covering all of the basic nuances of Star trek. Here in the center of a fairly local conflict, which is only a passing episode in the life of the participants. I guess in General, especially not pay attention to my grumbles, the film is not bad its genre. And with a total deficit, a very decent copy, but still I'm a little disappointed. Not enough, I pathos and scale. Well, sorry.

Worked on the film army of creators. Four of the writer and as many as thirteen producers. He directed by J. J. Abrams, who is co-producer and a-scriptwriter. For the most part, Abrams is known to all as a producer. As Director specializiruetsya on big-budget, but not too rated movies with all this bring an impressive income. For the Armageddon was even nominated for the Raspberries, although the film and paid off in the tenfold size. Nemesis — definitely the success is not only commercial, but and professional. On the moment, Embassy rating a very high position.

faq
How much has Star Trek Into Darkness made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $467,365,246.
How much did it cost to make Star Trek Into Darkness?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $190,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Star Trek Into Darkness?
This tv-show was directed by J.J. Abrams.
What is the genre of Star Trek Into Darkness?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure, Best movies 2013.
Who starred in Star Trek Into Darkness?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg.
What is Star Trek Into Darkness IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.7.
When was Star Trek Into Darkness released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2013-05-16.