Scream 4

Sidney Prescott last few years were spent in relative peace and quiet. Life is slowly getting better, away from the flashes and cameras of the paparazzi. But when they find the body of one of the students, the world of Sidney Prescott again begins to crumble. All because of a resurgent killer in a mask "Ghost Face".

Director:
  • Wes Craven

Stars:
Release Date: 2011-04-15
IMDb icon 6.1/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $40,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $97,231,420
reviews
Murial Ellis
16 April 2011 | 10:46

Just returned from the cinema. The impression of the movie, I must say, is twofold. Being an ardent fan of the previous three parts, I'm afraid of the fourth part can spoil the impression of all "Scream" at all. Glad to announce that my fears were confirmed only partly.

Yes, this film is inferior to the previous "Screams", but it failed to call did not. First, a huge thank you to the filmmakers for enjoy the is virtually ageless cast that happy with us, and three previous films. This, in really, really big plus, which is actually in the ways encouraged me on today's visit to the cinema. But that's most acting is good to say, though, there is nothing, however, and too bad — somehow mediocre, it is quite watchable, but a special emotion not called. (So, in the meantime, if talking about the young actors, I would like to mention the participation of Rory Culkin, the brother of all the well-known Macaulay Culkin came into the confrontation with the robbers in the movie "home Alone" in 1990.)

Did not like the fact that the film appeared more completely unnecessary Comedy. Here I loved previous "shouting", it that is present this delicate balancing between horror film genre Comedy this whole was a great slasher with a bit of humor, giving the film a certain poignancy, the fourth film as I were too comedic, T. E. the balance of genres has become something of coarse that whether this in the view was have such thoughts, a La "this is not that the Scream".

But film not a bad speaker, which will make you to watch it to the end. Pleased with the lack of so called "stupid conversations what" serving usually for"plugging holes" (with the exception of Tarantino). Was so attempt to keep the atmosphere of "old" shouting and move it already in the "stabbing" of 2011. With first minutes of the film music, which here is also returns us that the nostalgic universe of crazy killers in recognizable mask that makes comfortably settle into chair get pleasure from that before you is a valid continuation of the almost legendary horror movie.

Overall, "Scream 4" is a middle-class horror film, recommended in particular to fans of its prequels, well, and everyone else in principle. Not expect SVERKAJUSHEGO superinterface, — as say, for all accounts, he is inferior to the first three parts, but despite all this, watch it definitely worth it!

6.5 out of 10

Xaviera Gally
26 July 2011 | 10:51

That this creation fell into the category of "movie" — net error. It is not a movie. It is not part 4. It just another series of mediocre American TV series set on the rails of the genre "horror" show for nights TV. To the same the ever-present feeling that took a series explicitly up to the beginning of zero. If the feed takes more than an hour of screen time if it show cinema if the budget is several million dollars, this is still not a reason to call this product film. But there are all attributes of the series: cute blonde; shining with an unnatural white teeth; on actors three layers of makeup, tacky "stars" of yesteryear adjoin faceless actors is just out of the role of "extras"; and of course, far-fetched the ears of the storyline with memories, resentments, squabbles and all that has always formed the basis of soap operas.

The picture is not save even far-fetched philosophy of the gadgets, the Internet and popularity at any cost. Miserable also seem to be new rules on the production of horror movies that tries to develop and to present to the height of his experience, Wes Craven, clothing owl manifest in flat banter. All smells like a sham and mothballs 90. How and "a particularly cruel and bloody" the murder scene, which, apparently, tried to modernize his creation by painting, but forgot that even while "Saw" has passed and the guts tumbled out anyone today not to scare you.

The only ray of light in this dark world — the ending. She really good. No, not because the original. She just interesting, at least some of its vaudevillist when all jump, run, alive, running, dying. In this can not refuse. Just for the sake of her and should see this movie and to pay tribute to the great master of the past century, which not able to modernize itself.

In the dry residue would also add:

The story — 0.

Believability — 0 (Today even a child knows that if suddenly it happens more than two murders, then the FBI fly in the most distant town. It is not bloody trash, in the end, otherwise it is better to watch "Midnight Express").

Make-up — 100. (it is incredibly much on the wrinkles, the aged "stars" of past paintings).

Suits — 1 (didn't know the house, people are in socks and under hospital gowns in the wound wear bras).

5 from 10

because remove even worse.

Jeralee Gombach
04 September 2011 | 01:38

Finally. I reached the movie, which is so long awaited.

To be honest with caution and have been configured from view, so think about what can surprise, can make something original? Can make the ending that will really surprise. Because the beginning of the film begin to suspect everyone, absolutely. I almost every character looking for the killer, but whenever was so wrong, so as someone I thought — 5 minutes were killed. Sure was intended by the creators. But the amazing thing is that I or never suspected the real killer. And as soon as it became clear who that I immediately thought it is necessary to watch the movie yet again after some time. Because when you know who murderer, it helps to watch the movie, watching the actions of this particular character...

What terms of reason, I must admit it turned out to be very significant, but that time is the head could fit only a mentally ill person, although a priori it or not going to cut and crumble in cold blood so many people, and you don't others. Yeah and others normal people do not cut that they did not... Although it does not deviate from the topic,

What goes for actors and characters. Old Troika in the person of Campbell, and Arquette and Cox were on the right level, as in the previous three parts.

And that young children do not so and Shine. Especially the producers made the right decision I think Emma Roberts, who played cousin Sidney, first outwardly, she absolutely no, and secondly playing it bad. Not saw her other movies like, think a single movie can not be judged, but fact that she was quite convincing.

Here is hidden Panettiere memorable, vivid character, and was played well, it on other films you know and there is also playing well.

Still can not mark Anthony Anderson, I got a small role, but very memorable, yeah and may it not to be remembered. In any film of his appearance, though in a small role makes me very happy, so as you know exactly what will be a joke. Even in the trailer, he gets. By the way with funny moments in this film, too, everything OK, not much not a few, as necessary.

I love this film, starting with the first part and was really hoping that the new series does not disappoint, and and happened. Thank you all times the Weight of the Craven that has decided to remove 4uû part. Have you get to cheers.

In one word a lot to say about the movie, I as a fan of the first three parts stating a fact that the fourth part of my hope justified. For me "the Scream" was and is the best slasher. The film which has created numerous parodies, in particular, the famous "scary movie" (by the way, Anthony Anderson plays 3 4 parts there). Certainly understandable IMDB rating of 6.6 is a genre film, it not all for this film is a good estimate, and I turn put 10, otherwise not can

faq
How much has Scream 4 made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $97,231,420.
How much did it cost to make Scream 4?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $40,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Scream 4?
This tv-show was directed by Wes Craven.
What is the genre of Scream 4?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Horror, Mystery.
Who starred in Scream 4?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Lucy Hale, Roger Jackson, Shenae Grimes-Beech, Dane Farwell, Anna Paquin.
What is Scream 4 IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 6.1.
When was Scream 4 released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2011-04-15.