Scream 3

As was bound to happen, the terrible incident in Woodsboro steel an ideal material for Hollywood: there was filmed for the third series of the film "stab". Meanwhile, Sydney leads a secluded life in Northern California, where he learns about the new monstrous murders. Past re-appoints her fatal meeting, and this time round should be...

Director:
  • Wes Craven

Stars:
Release Date: 2000-02-04
IMDb icon 5.6/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $40,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $161,834,276
reviews
Kass Stevenson
20 August 2015 | 04:56

"Scream 3" — it's account movie in one of the most famous series of horror movies that became a cult already neither a single generation of people. The great thing here in that as the release of each new film, you do not stop to experience a genuine interest in during their review!

The main character Sidney Prescott in again trying to get my life together, trying to retire from the rest of the world in Northern California. But suddenly kill cotton Wire occur one after death to the set of the film "stab 3". Then a close-knit trio of heroes in part of funny COP Dewey, the controversial journalist Gale weathers and Sidney the most. Life again makes you take them off your film, the plot of which are their own life. The denouement was very unexpected...

I also really like that for the entire line of the movie "Scream" change the key actors — Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox and David Arquette. They have become so as a team that both them you just can't imagine. For a few shots in this series of horror movies they has learned to get used to their roles!

I want to say about that this movie is just a must watch to all fans of horror movies! Intense scary scenes, a plot with many branches (to take only the history of relations Gail and Dewey), the film is impossible to miss. Also, my opinion, he no worse than the first part, and better than the second.

Of 9 10

Arluene Bander
02 April 2011 | 05:23

Well, I realized that while until the last part of the franchise "Scream", which I after watching the first two parts I insanely wanted to see. Of course I knew games will be slightly stretched over the ears and killer will be all also kill their victims, podkaraulivaya their in the most unexpected places, but I see  the"Cries" not because of the storyline, although not that and from what in this kind of films to the latter is not know who maniac by the constantly wondering, but can this this one, Oh damn, is clearly not and maybe it is well in short everything in that the spirit, this makes the view unforgettable event and I personally at the same time receive enormous pleasure. I honestly watched the third part in the two approaches when looking at the first approach was already later to watch the end one side tomorrow to get up early in the morning and if inspection is not sleep will go zombies and if not know what all over, save all still not can, I will torture myself with the thought, and rights I was in their guesses or not found the maniac. In short I had to choose the second option, but medosmotre movie I and I couldn't sleep and the effect of "zombies" I have been provided for all day long, but but immediately after the arrival of the ill-fated school still I watched the movie and I can say that like I tried to guess who still a maniac, calculating bastard I had failed, in short the ending is a pleasant surprise, as however the painting itself, which turned out a bit worse than previous parts, which in my opinion are the best in the slasher genre for the history of cinema. In short, "Scream 3" I liked now start as usually to talk about the storyline of this part, which is my opinion is probably the worst of the entire trilogy.

The story tells about how the movie Studio decides to release a third account film from a series of "stab", which is based on explanation of the events which occurred a couple of years ago quiet place Woodsboro. At the time of the shooting killed a couple of actors and the project is now closed, but the killer of course not stop, because he need to all costs to find out where is now the unlucky victim Sidney Prescott, which again is in mortal danger, because at this time the killer decided to go in a scenario in the first place acquires a special device, through which you can communicate via phone absolutely any human voice. Of course all the crew to shock because the killer ends with their victims in the same order of and scenario, except that there is one problem, and very significant, but it has three scenario which they've read the killer, of course is not known. In the most dangerous game once again involved old faces, and the former officer Dewey, all the same annoying constantly seeking sensationalism journalist Gail, well and of course Sydney itself, which is the time from time start to haunt the ghosts of her mother, and in a variety of guises. After such statements by Sidney, local police suspect that any maniac and no it is the fruit of a once victim of the mind miss Prescott, but she knows that it not imagination, but the machinations of a cruel and very cunning maniac who is trying to lure Sydney and do that could not be the killer in past films...

The script of course is not so cool and interesting, but elegant ending saved the script in General my score equal component of the story a solid four points, very interesting to see what the writers will come up with a new, fourth movie. Here was some significant changes, so it's a beautiful cast.

"Hey, detective, and what your favorite horror movie?"
"My life!"


Everything is also great playing the Neve Campbell, which probably roles better than in the trilogy "Scream" so not played, so in the tapes NIV really hard and show all what requirements and it is fear, awe, surprise and in some moments the power of the spirit, so my score game miss Campbell again is five points. About a couple David Arquette Courteney Cox, speak not much I just once again they smartly played, yeah and together as one separately, I personally they are not present and the evaluation of both of them again is five points. Of the new faces would like of course immediately note Patrick Dempsey, which the image of a detective specializing in such cases looked very convincing and believable, and funny Parker Posey charismatic Steve Foley well and of course never aging lance Henriksen, which is just nice to see. Well of the ensemble cast, even would have given a small role a very well-known for the first picture is of individuals, like Liva Schreiber Jamie Kennedy, who in spite of death of the last part, managed something to help the right after living with the world, and with using the reserved video messages actually, Jamie was very pleased to see again, it is a pity that his character suffered such here unpleasant to consider. Shorter actors as always height in General, they all you can safely put five points. Music was on the highest level, well and I perhaps praising re-directing Wes Craven, which even in the third time manages to present one and the same story to the viewer so that this is extremely exciting and interesting, but for a production of my evaluation of course is five points and in addition to the weak plot in the third "Scream" cons personally, I find not could.

"do you Have her phone in memory?"
"Hmm..."
"Yes, in the phone memory, you idiot!"


Summary: a wonderful and very worthy conclusion to one of the best of the trilogy for horror films, along with "the evil dead". It's very interesting how look To be able to surprise in the fourth part, I will certainly go to cinema get a group of friends, well and the third "Scream" personally from me gets a pretty high rating, as follows:

8 from 10

Berget Gussy
02 October 2012 | 05:48

Is a threat?
- When I go to the threats, you will feel it.
- And is that a threat?


"Scream 3" — Wes Craven recognize recorded in the Guinness world record as one of the few Directors who created excellent trilogy. Trilogy really was just Grand, all three parts, was filled with mystery, intrigue and solid what the film is famous for in the first place, violent scenes. I noticed the bloody part — this is the first in second Wes Craven's a bit down on brakes probably worried that some countries again refuse service it's excluded of course, it would be silly, just created in same level in the previous part. "Scream 3" has probably the most interesting and the most thought-out plot of the whole trilogy. The third film was not a joke is dangerous and unpredictable, what to expect in the end, I didn't know who killer this time, not even guess if in former parts, before my eyes were the options, then here is a complete zero, no one at all.

A trio of main characters unchanged, this Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox and David Arquette. And if simple Sidney, Gail and Dewey. The plot of the third film completely isolate the main character Sidney Prescott. She lives alone in a house of her is Paris in the forest, her address phone number no one knows Sidney even works in the helpline with a made-up name, I say the same complete isolation from society. But wanting to kill Sidney as we have had seen enough, and here was a man trying to lure Sidney to the Rouge from their burrows. The way he found very effective, the Ghost in the mask started to kill friends Sydney and then leave for victims pictures of her mother. It is clear that Sydney decided to withdraw from his secretive life to understand her he suffers from nightmares related to the murder of her mother who visits her dreams every night.

Gail is now the real star of television. According to the book remove the third part of the film "stab". The killer starts to play game all the actors, who star in a third part of the stab, he kill them as they have to die at the scenario, you will agree that the idea is amazing. For me the third film was the final, very clear ending, all placed on places to someone all ended well, for whom his guts, but the final was held at this was to be put an end but not to take stupid, no need a fourth part. Summing up I will say, Wes Craven not wanted to make this part, but as you can see in the end agreed, for he say thank you only the movie, for all the trilogy.

of 10 10

faq
How much has Scream 3 made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $161,834,276.
How much did it cost to make Scream 3?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $40,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Scream 3?
This tv-show was directed by Wes Craven.
What is the genre of Scream 3?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Horror, Mystery.
Who starred in Scream 3?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Liev Schreiber, Beth Toussaint, Roger Jackson, Kelly Rutherford, Neve Campbell.
What is Scream 3 IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.6.
When was Scream 3 released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2000-02-04.