Paranormal Activity 3

The story takes place in 1988. In the house where lives a family with two children, start to happen strange things. Christie, one of the girls, begins to communicate with an invisible friend Toby, who settled in their home.

Director:
  • Henry Joost
  • Ariel Schulman

Stars:
Release Date: 2011-10-21
IMDb icon 5.8/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $5,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $207,039,844
reviews
Lynn Happy
27 October 2011 | 05:36

For reviews of my friends, I always thought Paranormal activity movie, not worthy of my viewing. That, in principle, fully confirmed when before the premiere of 3 part I decided to watch the first two.

A new direction in the horror film industry? The minimum cost of shooting simple frightening effects? Yes, it would be better all the horrors were like the old nightmares, from that night afraid to stick out from under the blanket than that !! About the aesthetic pleasure of viewing is of course possible to forget, this same "Amateur" photography. But it was possible to do without polupostelny scene, which only caused a storm of laughter in the whole audience with its absurdity.

Sam the film is not included many interesting points, which, apparently, was sickly intimidating, judging by the trailer.

Invisible friend Toby? Yes, it is interesting. Grandma is a witch? Yeah, too bad. From could make a good film with a fascinating story. But it's even the Director managed to screw it up.

The ending summed up. Too abruptly. If more hours we look at wandering sleepy children, opening-closing doors and other highly impressive paranormal, then last 10 minutes happen most dramatic events: the murder, cult, fire, witches, signs, children. Not too, huh?

So, the film is not much. Nothing scary about not been. In the movie is worth going only if no more comedies not going. Of reasons to laugh will be enough.

3 of the 10

Trescha Baxie
05 November 2011 | 10:11

After the second part I already do not been waiting for a worthy continuation. But I am glad that still looked at the third part!

Often I came across the view that "Paranormal activity" — nonsense not a horror movie. All somehow I think that if there ugly monsters, blood and guts, it is not horror. That because of stupid stereotypes? Are really scary. to watch it? Rather just frustrating. Not more. In"Paranormal phenomenon" is different. And this once it lovely.

Now go to the third part of the movie. I want to see that it has a good sense of humor that allows you to emotionally relax and to show sympathy for the characters. The family that we show looks convincing, and observe their life is really interesting. The biggest plus of "Paranormal activity 3" in that you don't have almost half the movie to wait for the scary moments. There is almost with the beginning, we keep tension. If the second part caused my boredom in waiting for some action, then the third does not have this drawback. It was interesting to watch every scene from beginning to the end of the film. Let the majority of cases we are afraid of the banal and abrupt "BOO!" and such techniques, but it was really works! The fifth point, as before, breaks away from the chair and the eyes are afraid once again to blink, just don't miss the intriguing point.

You should pay attention that 3 of a lot of fresh ideas. There are not only moving or flying objects, but and something new, about what I want to tell those who haven't watched this movie, thereby spoil the impression of the film. But nothing to be done :)

Two little girls, who played the role in this part made me really worry. As we already seen in the movie kill good or evil uncles. To this, is all used to. And children — it is quite another thing. And even if this idea new, beat it great. Thanks to these two girls, the authors were able to show how really angry "creature" faced characters in the movie.

The third part is even better than the original literacy submission. In there anything superfluous, all is well balanced. And you probably want to finish watching, not know what same all over.

Perhaps the cons of both times can be attributed to the finals, because everything ends on a cliffhanger, but but remains intriguing, for which I would be glad to see the sequel.

In conclusion, you better watch this film at home alone. In cinemas, it is lost much of the atmosphere because of the "witty" sayings of neighbors. Yeah and do we know in the dark, being in a large company?

For what is one of the few films that can really scare, I making it on:

10 of 10

Tootsie Towney
01 August 2012 | 04:42

The phenomenal success of the first and second parts do not the long wait for the "Paranormal activity 3". To sorry.

The idea of a prequel to the prequel eliminates any suspense. The viewer knows in advance that happens than it will scare and than in the result will end. But not the main problem of the third part. The main problem in that Henry Joost and Ariel. Schulman started a third time one same the tea bag, not even without bothering to properly seal their film with the originals.

First, the events of the third part contradict what happens in the future. A very significant blunder.

Secondly, all style and atmosphere of the original is gone. Episode call Bloody Mary, in which the Ghost materialized in scary-woman-with-dirty-long-hair, was called to ruin on the root of the basic idea of Paranormal activity, according to which the viewer is invited to encounter the absolute faceless evil, not have no way or view. Now we deal with another film about witch hands, covered in marsh mud. This was already many times.

Thirdly, the film is laughable. Cause the viewer laugh instead of fear — the worst thing that can happen to a good horror. Aristotle said that the laugh drama — the most powerful weapon. Laughter kills any other sense, especially in our time, when to scare the audience much more difficult than to laugh. Of course, it's hard to explain what can laugh at "Paranormal activity 3"... Maybe a Ghost who climbed under the sheet?

In "the Paranormal phenomenon 3" no nothing but timing and familiar shooting method. This film is at all points inferior to the mediocre second part, and the first part do not stand no comparison.

As its predecessors, "Paranormal activity 3" has collected a surprisingly high register. But if the success of the first part it is possible to justify, to explain the success of the third part, I not force. This is probably the power of a competent advertising campaign, because the artistic value of the film doesn't bear.

I decided to put "the Paranormal phenomenon 3" the lowest rating. Maybe you agree with me. But if not is bad, what then a bad movie?

1 of 10

PS: While the difference between the cost of shooting box office receipts will exceed at least $10 million, we will get endless paranormal phenomena, which do not otherwise abnormal have not called. Wait 4uû  & 5ую parts. Perhaps the new prequel will lead us in the middle ages. Whether there's a VHS camera?

faq
How much has Paranormal Activity 3 made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $207,039,844.
How much did it cost to make Paranormal Activity 3?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $5,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Paranormal Activity 3?
This tv-show was directed by Henry Joost, Ariel Schulman.
What is the genre of Paranormal Activity 3?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Thriller, Horror, Mystery.
Who starred in Paranormal Activity 3?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Lauren Bittner, Christopher Nicholas Smith, Chloe Csengery, Jessica Tyler Brown, Hallie Foote.
What is Paranormal Activity 3 IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.8.
When was Paranormal Activity 3 released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2011-10-21.