Pandemic

On planet Earth brutal to a terrible virus that turns people into mindless and violent creatures. Dr. Lauren in a small group aimed at the center of the city on a mission to find and rescue uninfected survivors.

Director:
  • John Suits

Stars:
Release Date: 2016-04-01
IMDb icon 4.4/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $8,459
reviews
Dolly Bern
12 March 2017 | 02:20

From viewing left with the impression rendered in the header. The sense of deficiency only and all leave on the entire film. The plot is hackneyed to the obscene, we again afraid of the zombie Apocalypse. But if "28 days later" or"world war Z" attaches to the screen here felt only an Amateur the level of a student skit.

The authors tried to write the characters, but made it as clumsy, not deeply. Not always understand the motives of those or other characters. The driver with the shooter quarrel, the Director carefully brings them on the conflict, but nothing does not work. With the rest is the same trouble. The game some of the characters missing so on. People just say the text on the camera.

Operator's work in that not. The operator has not have decided — or omitted to make a film from the first person, all felts has to the classical genre, and can give a close-up? Or to mimic Amateur photography? In the result is a mishmash.

Even the zombies in the film zombie. Like the authors have tried to outline some dynamics of the disease, but too overdone. In the result we have five types of patients. Why? The viewer too tedious to parse the course of the film what stage of the disease have characters. The authors try with screen to suggest that have already a viewer is not confused, but again goes beyond not natural. In the result have strange zombies that are in some moments mad rush to meet death, and some do not respond to people.

The only plus of the film — not a bad work of makeup artists. Blood in the movie a lot, killing violent, with a knockout of the brain, leakage of the eyes, and other abominations.

Film on the fan. If the zombie Apocalypse — theme for you, to spend an hour and a half of life in viewing is possible. But special miracles is not wait. The film is based on the average level of the series on the secondary channel.

Paulina Silver
13 December 2016 | 02:34

Let's start with that a poster for which formed some idea about the movie is totally not correspond to reality, so as the poster depicts "a descendant of VIN Diesel", and not brave team of 4 untrained people, it from watching the film one gets the impression that is knew this film barely C grade pulls, so I decided to lure.

The second point is of course the beginning of the film, where shows the levels of the virus and in the film, only at least 15 minutes mentioned 5 level, about you forget to the point

The third point is the nonlinearity of the film, because Beano shaky camera, pretty hard to keep track of occurring. And gluing these moments are very poorly conveys the story of wanted to show the Director.

The fourth and probably the most sad moment is the average film somewhere 2005-2010 with a very small budget and bad acting.

On the positive side I will mention only the scenery, Yes, in General, a good computer processing, than some of the other films of this genre.

We conclude that the film is not recommended view, a pretty bad experience.

1 of 10

Eleni Skutchan
12 January 2018 | 12:19

Not that the movie is bad how to write about it. If you take a common, theme of zombie horror have a pretty boring, so each year produced about 3 dozen movies about the infected, but... "Pandemic" was all the chances to obtain the status of a good paintings in this direction. And I think the brainchild of John Switze bad happened. Yes, there are a large number of disadvantages, such as a cliche, illogical plot twists and forever tatsumasa camera, but. 

Will try to open my choice of evaluation more details:

Attempts at innovation. Yes, here is the bitten person is not directly amenable to the virus, and to become completely "zombified" he will have to pass four levels of infection. Moreover, on the first level infected nothing outwardly different from healthy members of society. To the scenes taken from the first person I were skeptical, since taken these mediocre shots, and forever shaky camera advantages it adds.

Technical side. As for a low-budget picture, beyond expectations. Footage of the city, suffered from virus to high level, however, as and makeup infected.

Characters(actors). While, in General, a good game of acting caste, I want to ask the question, "Why do with all sides of the rescue operation sending untrained people?". It seems that took the first. Of the actors like to point out Rachel Nichols that conveyed the emotions of her character. Also there Alfie Allen, familiar to fans of "Game of thrones" (it should be noted that plays somewhat similar role). Disappointment for me was Missy Pyle, the character of which do not carry any meaning, but become more meat for the zombies. The actress had to pull out of his character not able. Something similar and character Mecha of Phifer, but he in turn stood out with excessive aggression even in the moments where she was logical.

As a result, the film of the popular themes of trying to show new views on the proposed directions for that we can only thank the creators.

7 of 10

faq
How much has Pandemic made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $8,459.
Who is the director of the movie Pandemic?
This tv-show was directed by John Suits.
What is the genre of Pandemic?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Horror.
Who starred in Pandemic?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Rachel Nichols, Alfie Allen, Missi Pyle, Mekhi Phifer, Paul Guilfoyle.
What is Pandemic IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 4.4.
When was Pandemic released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2016-04-01.