Never Let Me Go


The trio of main characters grew up in the orphanage and was deprived of any contact with the outside world. But over time, the friends know who they really are...

Director:
  • Mark Romanek

Stars:
Release Date: 2010-10-15
IMDb icon 7.1/10
  • Country: GB
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $15,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $9,918,093
reviews
Tarah Mobley
06 January 2011 | 01:48

I thought above the title to my review, but and not come up with that is to write. The thing that movie I did not like. No, he shot great, the actors are chosen well, they have to Wake up some dormant feelings, though, the plot disappoint. And now in order.

The plot is interesting, but not developed, is unclear. If you take this story over the basis, it was possible to make a more ambitious film that will appeal to a broad audience, and not favourites movie lovers.

The beginning itself is quite nice: the kids are in cozy a comfortable boarding-school, well-dressed, fed, even walking on the fresh air and play different kind of game, among them are clever gifted with talents. This wonderful time of childhood, when just beginning to live. Front-opening whole life! But these children it is not given, because they are clones and future donors. At adulthood, they will do 3-4 operations for organ transplants in the result life will break...

When I looked at scenes from my childhood heroes, I have all been waiting-when they will run away from this system will break the connection with the orphanage, run far away and start my real human life.

The whole movie heroes growing up, with the pokorstvo prepared to be a donor, then became donors. The main character meekly "gave" my love "friend". The betrayal of a friend somehow quickly faded among the monotonous routine of clones that were not less resembled living people with their sincerity, sensitivity, pain, sadness. Completely different I waited film — rebellion, explosion, teenage "want" and"I will".

In the end I was quite disappointed in the movie, but suddenly there you said above I thought at the time, credits, and after the film.

"None of the us not really takes life and don't feel it all the time..." a Man who has lived a whole life, may not be done anything important, and saving it a donor who may have loved someone and admired the memories of his short life. I heard the phrase equality. What life everyone deserves. But not everyone is able to live it and not to miss, because there is no second chance. Therefore, in me as a growing indignation at the fact that people, even the clones, here is so you kill, even to save these people.

6 from 10

Felicity Erinna
26 May 2013 | 02:27

People of my generation have hard to take such films. They first and foremost, of course, seem tedious, no effect. One word — no. And the needs of modern people on the screen? Action, intrigue, Comedy — in this film, nothing it is not. Yeah and, indeed, why? After all, it is drama. The story is very grave and serious. And maybe I would say well as all other if not imbued with the the idea...

How does it feel — live suddenly to know what you were created? And the fact that you know more bad than good. I love the plot of the film. He crazy life this is really heavy. In this, of course, and the merit of the actors.

I watched two movie the part Carey Mulligan. There is such a strange dislike for the man. Look at it — not like it. Although well see what she amazingly played the role. Not can you imagine her in Comedy or any other genre. Have her such a compassionate look. There is no doubt that it is their role to fulfill and was able to convey all the mood of the film. Perhaps it and liked the most. Even more keira Knightley that surprising for me. But still (not know why) like this actress. Keira Knightley is my favorite actress. Nor for who not secret that she loves historical films. Actually, it was in movies in this genre, you can see the most of the time. And this picture was one of its distinctive works. She stand out on the other thanks to the time in which the action takes place. Knightley knows his place and is able to fulfill the task. The role of Ruth went to it is perfect. Such a "bilateral" character. True, she somehow trying to hide. And public, which plays on the audience, how would showing all its unnatural and absurd joy on his face. And she managed to show the two side the depth. And I have repeat: despite all the beauty of this actress on her talent and everything else, Mulligan touches in this film a lot more. Well and the main actor — Andrew Garfield. I am delighted of his game. Have him a really good look. And it felt sorry for the most. Although the fate of them all three were identical with the beginning. And the heroine Mulligan even had heavier Garfield all still gave understand feel like felt they.

I came to my delight music that movie. Tunes were only two. And one of them touches just to the depth. Rachel Portman has managed to maintain the atmosphere of the film. So beautiful, touching and powerful music. I think her composition The Pier will be soul. It can not like it.

On their face burned lost years. For what they still lived? They were people not yet have known who they. Such a powerful story of the human soul. Of human hopes. And with one hand on all that occurs in film just want to say "disgusting". Is it possible to use people here so, if they are a piece of meat and no more? The story and the truth is very strong. Strong and tragic. Specific action to be here and could not, therefore, of course, the film was a bit boring. But trying to sink deeper and realize problem but also to penetrate the acting and music.

To the end is not through the rating of the film. Let it and it seems boring, but still the saddest and the strongest story makes me put from 9 10. Brilliant actors, which allow even better understand the problem of mankind. Let it and sacrifice in good whether it?

"We did any of the galleries to check your soul. We did the gallery to see if she you."

Linnet Sheng
01 July 2011 | 10:21

The film impressed me. Impressed so much that a few days after his knew I winced, remembering it. Somehow, after I understand the meaning of the film, I remembered one domestic film of the early nineties. In it still played Dmitri Pevtsov. And most importantly, I remembered, so it is a scene of the movie show an interactive poll on the topic: "is it Possible the homeless to use for donation?" At the time of the survey interviews with passers-by, and those state that I don't need that homeless people in modern society are a kind of social stuff. I think the idea of these two films is that no secondary, no  of"stuff". We all equal, all important all valuable. And no one deserves the fate of a piece of meat, which can do all that you want.

10 of 10

faq
How much has Never Let Me Go made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $9,918,093.
How much did it cost to make Never Let Me Go?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $15,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Never Let Me Go?
This tv-show was directed by Mark Romanek.
What is the genre of Never Let Me Go?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Sci-Fi, Drama, Romance, Best movies 2010.
Who starred in Never Let Me Go?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield, Izzy Meikle-Small, Charlie Rowe, Ella Purnell.
What is Never Let Me Go IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.1.
When was Never Let Me Go released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2010-10-15.