Mary Poppins Returns


The film tells about new adventures Mary and her friend Jack, who will meet with the representatives of the next generation of the family banks.

Director:
  • Rob Marshall

Stars:
Release Date: 2018-12-19
IMDb icon 6.7/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $130,000,000
reviews
Ardelia Esau
09 January 2019 | 02:40

"All things are possible. One has only to want." — the slogan which dictates the film "Mary Poppins returns" and infinitely many times confirms expression.

Mary Poppins — history, which is not so close to me to it is infinitely to be admired, but in the same time, will bring me back again in 4 class of school, forcing him to recall the Mary Poppins about the tutorial for summer reading to refresh these memories.

All the kids love Mary Poppins, however no loud had this statement. Perhaps each of us to some extent, whether it is a child, and may adult, dreamed about that a man appeared in life and fix all that goes awry. I believe that the heroine, Mary — is the epitome of inspiration in so as her boundless bravery gives hope solely on all the best can be the world.

"Mary Poppins returns" similar to the classic fairy tale, or film-adventure, clearly sending us far 64-year when the film was filmed received the most fame.

Surprisingly, of the Emily blunt turned out great Mary Poppins, the character is brave, serious, but not without the spirit of adventure and adventurism. Emily is extremely pleasant and melodious lady that can be called a dreamy-serious, although probably in itself imagine the combination of these words seems absurd. (nonsense, nonsense and nonsense!) Emily blunt I liked the film edge of tomorrow, but the role of these are too different to them were a bit to give a comparison. However, in case Mary Poppins story seems much more bright, cute and carefree.

The complete film is filled with tunes old disney cartoons, classic animation and an indescribable feeling of being in a country childhood, in some of Netlandii where everything seems possible and feasible, we can only wish. Perfectly looks animation component, showing us a brilliant cartoon and musical one.

Ben whishaw in my mind is firmly entrenched as Robert Frobisher of the film Cloud Atlas, although, perhaps, have it's time to expand the horizons regarding its acting possibilities. In as Michael banks it looks very prosaic, taking in all extravagance and romanticism of other characters. However, this feed makes note of sanity and reason to the story.

The most pleasant memories leaves Lin-Manuel Miranda, who played the lamplighter Jack. The execution of the role and mood of the character look very beneficial in the bigger picture at this bring in the plot of apparent magic, supported by cheerful dances and music.

Emily Mortimer (Jane banks) I remember the film "the time Keeper" and hence it is possible to judge that such as a very she go.

Of all the children all look brighter Pixie Davies (Anabel) that have managed to remember her as Bronwyn in "the House of strange children Miss peregrine".

I think Mary Poppins not necessarily this particular film, — this is truly a legendary character, which fully shows us how it is important to be kind, brave and remember the miracles which really very much, and I now about magic in its classical sense, of course, and about the magic of the ordinary, but in the same time, bringing so much joy in our lives: the sun that shines on the mornings, rustling leaves, running barefoot in the wet the grass, playing with children, watching good movies, laughter, smiles and a double portion of ice cream. All this adds one big jigsaw puzzle, — kids, "Mary Poppins returns" will reveal the doors his world.

happy viewing!

8 from 10

Theresita Congdon
19 September 2019 | 09:40

American musical film distant 1964 "Mary Poppins" was a great adaptation of the tale of Pamela Lyndon Travers. Julie Andrews played there for his best role, and received his acting in the love of the audience, and also the critical acclaim in the face of the Oscar. Personally, I love fantasy it's beautiful.

The Soviet film adaptation of 1984, also have a positive attitude. And the movie its atmosphere, a certain zest, kindness. The character of Poppins is iconic in the world of fairy tales, and if someone doesn't looked or read about her history, then just heard.

Personally, when I learned that out sequel after so many years, and the main role will play a beautiful and nice actress Emily blunt, the inspired knew this musical movie is sure to have a look. Seeing his, the smile with the faces quickly disappeared. Western critics praise this movie treat it positively. My the attitude this picture is neutral. Moreover not share this much too hard to beat.

After the General euphoria it is difficult to Express a different point of view, but the film is really not a masterpiece. I wouldn't want this shekel was directed by Rob Marshall. Would be better if someone else.

Once Rob Marshall directed the film, which I personally love — "memoirs of a geisha". Adaptation of the famous bestseller turned out fine. To her Marshall had already success in the musicals. Talking about high-profile film "Chicago." Exactly Rob Marshall filmed the story of the mermaids in"pirates of the Caribbean: On stranger tides". Well, and of course a loud and enchanting musicals "Nine" and"the farther into the forest...", it Wallpaper which are neutral.

That is why didn't want the story of Poppins filmed this Director. He took high school musical "Chicago", but it was a long time ago. Ko all the latest his music pictures are indifferent. But the biggest concern that this Director is going to shoot "the little Mermaid" the upcoming Disney movie. If only not all ruined.

But back to "Mary Poppins Returns". In this sequel we see the story of how the magical and mysterious nanny, Mary Poppins is going to educate a new generation of the family banks. In the house of this family's troubles are happening and a number of issues now, and cute and the perfect nanny Poppins right now so need...

But it's impossible! — How could it be possible that going to really?

Of course, a costume tale filmed, atmospheric, and money on it is not sorry. Suits, dresses, entourage on the background all it was perfect. Emily blunt is well accustomed to famous role as the face of the film. It is the scene with her captured by itself the most attention.

The beginning pictures are NOT like it. Failed, unknown actor, laced song. It was somehow empty, interesting. This musical is not enough most of the charm, the dynamics of a certain magic. Some of the scenes and not wanted to watch, wanted to rewind. The film is not hooked. In  the"Return" is not have the magic something enchanting that was the original or even a Soviet film. Here it looked all dry.

The children were playing convincing, Colin Firth in the face of the villain was nice to see. Meryl Streep was a great advertisement for this tale, but her presence was wanted more. Something is not enough. Lin-Manuel Miranda — a bad choice of actor, and even Julie Walters are good, but in the musical she played "how to lose quickly".

Was not movie magic in this film, the picture is not cling, and so again, that do not share this enthusiasm of Western critics. What's more magical moments some with visual effects and does seem silly and empty. Not think I would watched this movie the second time or someone they shared.

"Mary Poppins comes back" — American, family, a fabulous musical, 2018. The result, a film for those who really love musicals and this is a key aspect. I as a lover of the old movie about Poppins, was not satisfied with dubious and contentious proceeding. Get well-known actors, and not watch the film to the end.

Carena Luce
10 January 2019 | 09:48

Mary Poppins is back.

I watched the first part of the year ago was waiting for the continuation. So well as those I watched the movie as a kid in the 60s.

From the first notes of the soundtrack I realized the film will justify my standby.

The film is not only modern children, but and children of the past.

Mary Poppins returned like a distant relative that never seen for a long time. Many years. From this tear.

A new film appeared on the first part. All the same composes, but at the same time managed to avoid the copy and follow.

The film is colorful.

Modern technology has helped to make the story more alive.

The musical numbers are very good! They can be known only to those who rose contemporary music.

I wanted to go itlas. What did the little children.

The film is a lot of morality, in the same time it is not imposed.

Throughout the film I was not feeling that I, along with characters swim in a bottomless tub, or ride crew vase.. or in the house where all upside down every other Wednesday...

Mary Poppins 1964 has become one of the best movies of the 20th century.

Mary Poppins comes back the 21st century.

For many years, not one generation of children will be watching both of the movie.

I feel that touched the history by watching this movie in the cinema.

Really want to see Mary Poppins back earlier than 50 years.

10 of 10

faq
How much did it cost to make Mary Poppins Returns?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $130,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Mary Poppins Returns?
This tv-show was directed by Rob Marshall.
What is the genre of Mary Poppins Returns?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Fantasy, Family, Music, Musical, Best movies 2018, Oscar 2019, Best Family Movies 2018, Best Fantasy Movies 2018, Best Music Movies 2018, Best Musical Movies 2018.
Who starred in Mary Poppins Returns?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Emily Blunt, Meryl Streep, Julie Walters, Colin Firth, Emily Mortimer.
What is Mary Poppins Returns IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 6.7.
When was Mary Poppins Returns released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2018-12-19.