Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome

In the city ruled by insidious Bartertown sovereign Entity. To consolidate his power, it tries to use max, the unsurpassed master of road battles. But now a fascinating series of car showdown under a withering sun beginning to change incredible hand-to-hand fighting.

  • George Miller
  • George Ogilvie

Release Date: 1985-07-10
IMDb icon 6.3/10
  • Country: AU
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $10,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $36,230,219
Kerri Bilicki
30 September 2009 | 09:24

With the third part of "Mad max" was just so well as and "Rambo 3". The impression of view these different fighters one — original was the most intelligent and the grim, the sequel to the most spectacular and dynamic, the third turned into an expensive story-the pacifier. Funny, but after all, there are even some similarities — John Rambo in the beginning well as and Max, participates in the battle "in the arena", although in the past both the hero was tough loners who are simply not submit to public.

The desire to earn on such a famous name, yeah even after a powerful second part, of course. It even invited the world famous Tina Turner the main role of the villain, which, however, there is not proved to be a talented actress. But worse than the other — from atmospheric post-apocalyptic Thriller "Mad Max" was made in the likeness fantasy action games, like endless B-movie of the 90s. Just in the head does not understand how mad independent Max just happened to be in the center of played circus cruelty.

The program concept is not send the film in favor — no auto-monsters and crazy pursuits, instead of hard fighting, which, however, lags far behind even the first works of van Damme. Yes, there are cool and fair in Max version not so young Mel Gibson, how it remember the first part. But against him fight dressed "freaks" like Master Blaster, the view which is a pity. The battle itself is sometimes brutal, the blood is not sorry, but now ingenuity is clearly not enough. Yeah and it's not the show, hosted "Aunt Entity" that spoils the impression.

On the other hand, to expect from the post-apocalyptic fiction, which did not initially the promise of the previous features of the trilogy, something special and not hunting. What stated in annotation, it and got. But to deprive max of the wheels is the same thing that  & Rambo — his knife and crossbow. "Rambo 3" was 100% American inspirational and Patriotic action, and "Mad Max 3" — the most ordinary fiction, which is only interested in the main character. However, the situation slightly smooths the final massacre, a little reminiscent of "road Warrior". As there may, the second such film with a similar cast and children's writing did.

In my opinion — as usually sometimes, the third part was the weakest, but not enough to really about her to forget.

Lexie Agnola
07 May 2015 | 07:11

"How much rope does not curl, and end will still be..." — proverb.

I knew it! I assumed with almost absolute certainty that after 2 pretty good parts Mad max will, shall we say, not the successful continuation of. And it is an understatement. Be ready to see the utter tastelessness and dullness of what is happening.

the Plot. Almost all the film will happen in a squalid town "Bartertown", the name of which we like hints about the main occupation, which involved its residents. All inside of him so bad that even the electricity in the city runs from a pig manure. (!) Our good old (and crazy) Max gets in it by accident, but immediately is embroiled in a plot against the chief of electricity. All of the remaining screen time Max just "goes with the flow", almost independently taking any decisions. All somehow happen yourself.

And here here lies one of the main shortcomings of the 3rd piece: max completely deprived of nature. Now he is a limp rag rather than a strong-willed and slightly crazy protagonist. Not be surprised if you don't recognize the main character.

Atmosphere. Start with that in the third part, it was decided to focus on melee combat, and the classic madness on the roads to get back closer to the finale of the story. Therefore, it turns out that we Mad Max no of neither is madness. And why, then, was the General issue movie? More than an hour of screen time the viewer is forced to observe a boring combat, uninteresting scenes and faceless characters. In the eye also catches the bad acting of almost all involved, including Mel Gibson. There is a feeling that he's a soulless mannequin, which just plays a role, but would soon to receive a fee. The ending is generally formed in utter nonsense, which generates numerous issues. For example, why chase the protagonist (after considerable effort and fuel), then to all still it to let all 4 side? Just... just because "they look like a couple of vagrants"... No, they're totally kidding, right?

special Effects. In the end of the tape there is only one chase cars for the train. In it contains a favorite of fans of stunts and explosions. More you nothing find.

Music. Music was finally turned into a abuse ears. Now she is more like a rumble and ringing of the some pipe than at least a sort of soundtrack. The most correct solution is its just off.

Result. All quite sad. Authors should finish the story of Mad Max on the second part of its gallant adventures.

3 of the 10

(28%), "Under the Thunderdome" were suddenly buried under a whole bunch of pig poop from Bartertown.

Adrea Goodard
20 July 2015 | 07:45

The film directed by George Miller is definitely one of the most iconic figures in cinema history. I as a Director, which is quite easy jumping from one genre to another, and tried his art in all starting with the animated movies to a brutal post-apocalyptic Thriller. Rather as perhaps the most recognizable Australian filmmaker and Creator of the cult franchise "Mad max". No one is expected this, but the first film Miller was a unique event in world cinema, and the sequel was a rare exception to the rules, which state that continue always inferior to the original. But unfortunately log-in the same river twice is far from each the task wasn't the teeth George Miller.

Not to say that the film Director George Miller is a complete disappointment for fans of the iconic franchise, but certainly Miller took perhaps the weakest film of the entire series. Amazing how would follow the main commandments of the previous two parts, but simultaneously this represents something absolutely other and different. After all, if the first film was tough enough Thriller, but the second film is — post-apocalyptic blockbuster, this film is a complete fairy tale for children. Than perhaps the film and pushes the most.

Of course the film has everything these scenes of car chases, explosions, destruction and other spectacles, to which we are so accustomed to over last two of the film, but certainly they are losing was more like from the point of view of quantity, so and quality. Of course creating a little ambiguous picture of how the film is simultaneously trying to follow the principles of the previous parts, but and trying to win the sympathy of the young spectator and perhaps even children. Thus, literally tearing the film at the two and a little spoiling the overall atmosphere of all this excessive sentimentality.

Similarly ambiguous impression and a story that hit the too dramatic experiments. So, Max turned from a former COP with a tragic fate in a good Samaritan who is ready free of charge and easy to help absolutely everyone, closer to the end, even fully trying on the image a kind of nanny for local wild dietary for the watch is a little unusual. The however, the plot develops quite the canons of the genre, and not bad.

Despite how was filed by Max with the point of view of the story, played it a constant Mel Gibson as always great. In once got convinced that ideal candidates for this role is not find too sure. Damn good and Tina Turner in the way the main villain of the picture. Not being a professional actress, Turner places of course has overacted, but visually looked in the image is very delicious, impressive and appropriate. Than definitely pleasing to the eye on the whole tape.

4 10

Mad Max: Under Thunderdome — is not the continuation of the franchise, on which is calculated to start watching the picture. So as an experiment of film directed by George Miller with a fresh franchise resulted not so successful. Giving the impression of not brutal literally overflowing adrenaline movie, but rather sentimental and too a children's tale.

How much has Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $36,230,219.
How much did it cost to make Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $10,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome?
This tv-show was directed by George Miller, George Ogilvie.
What is the genre of Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure.
Who starred in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Mel Gibson, Bruce Spence, Adam Cockburn, Tina Turner, Frank Thring.
What is Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 6.3.
When was Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 1985-07-10.