Ghajini

I want to start this review with words that every country should have its own culture, and also your film. We, Western people, it is very gratifying when all the whole  play America. Yes, it is cool, this is fashionable. But, my God, how much cultures must break to finally get something "amerikosovsky".

Sorry for the emotions. Now specifically for the film.

After looking at me a terrible headache. Downright split. I realized you should not rely on one-man show, thinking that all movies where he plays extremely smart, beautiful, high-quality, relevant. To unfortunately, it is not so.

After "Stars on Earth", "Blind love", "Three idiots" and other beautiful films that are so were adorned with Aamir, I have experienced terrible, a complete disappointment. He broke. He lost me to be a person. Now he's all — trimmed by one machine, now it is not Hindu.

The main highlight in any Indian films — is what we hate — dance, dance, childish innocence, purity, faith in good it always win. But here...

Music videos is horrible. The creators of the film in rough form advertise beautiful body pumped of Aamir. Songs tedious, the rhythm uninteresting, boring. Paints all also not abounds. I simply squandered when as usual — look pleasure.

good — funny, not is it true? In our time, still welcome somewhere! But play mad, abnormal psycho with a thirst for revenge — not a role of Aamir Khan. I did not surprised such a huge amount of positive feedback... here is not one bit.

I always hated movies with copious amounts of blood. Why? Why is it show? For intimidation? But in the movie "Blind love" was clearly shown the brutality and cynicism, here is only a bloody fountains there was not.

Too pompous. Too silly. Overly pretentious.

Where India? It recessed America.

I want to mention the only advantage among a heap of negativity. This Asin. More precisely, the game. It so simple, sweet and direct, which I say with confidence, only for her and stupid curiosity I watched the movie up to the end.

I'm not in no way I advise you to watch the movie to people who liked the Aamir at his most bright and beautiful roles.

0 of 10

Personally, I did not like. Of course, this is my just my impression this picture. As I said in the header of the Hollywood film `Remember` much, much better. I watched it for a long time. I decided to look into basically due to the fact that there was a guy pierce, whom I appreciated. But when, really was shocked. And how not cool, in the memory remains so many movies that don't forget. But if remember that remember dear all in the film.

Already on the first half hour watching `Ghajini`, all more and more reminded me of `Remember`. The same disease, those tattoo on body, those 2 life — to after same killed my love. Of course, in the traditions of Indian films, there is added a certain amount of their moments, as the detailed story of love, big validity of actions of the main villain, is initially high social status of the protagonist, `Holiness and purity` of his beloved related these fun moments. But are the same. However, a special intrigue `Remember`, which is only the end, and makes the film in a thousand times amazing shocking before the slow sagging of the jaw, in`Ghajini`, thanks to the creators, removed. Seen such blatant plagiarism ashamed. Yeah and updated the story, not would be. 

Therefore, the story — nothing new — the main intrigue — explicit repetition. And More the plot or anything. And heroes and heroines of this kind we have seen not little.

Of course, not in `Ghajini` brilliant camera work, such as in `Remember`, and guy Pearce either. So that... I liked `Ghajini`. And after browsing to remember the thought — that made in the header. It's clear that in a lot of bollywood plagiarism, as as a whole lot where. In the end, there is only 7 notes. And how not to say, radically new see not often. But when I see the pathetic parody of that loved, respected, and could not forget almost 10 years, different reaction hardly possible. And faced with this is compare all.

Music in memory remains as and number. But, I have to say, I often squander musical numbers in Indian films, for other than is the participation Shahi — where they look finished music videos — only send MTV, and a pair of three movies without Shahi. In`Ghajini` such gifts to themselves not found.

The Aamir... It was the first film that I he watched. The only thing that remember — his crazy eyes in the first part of the picture. What really overly mad. Seen and really it on the head whacked. Then I thought — `well, in something like the dude played, at least not guy Pearce... Tom Hanks than that looks like`.

More like and have nothing to say.

If I didn't Remember`, then put b 7 — 8, I guess. But `Remember` was! And I doubt the filmmakers watched it.

So

4 of 10

What is important in a movie? I think a great idea, the execution and sincerity.

Many friends wonder why I love to watch Indian movies? They are stuck in their stereotypes somewhere in the 90-ies. They know that they personally deprive themselves of such number of emotions, thoughts and feelings that paint life with bright colors. After all, there are nice and bad movies; why they are to risk at least time to leave your usual comfort zone? Try to look at the wider world, to see it in all its glory?

"Ghajini" — a real gift. And no matter what is a remake of a remake: first, "Remember" (2000) I adored Nolan, and "Overcome yourself" (2005), and, finally, the "Ghajini" (2008). Now it is it does not matter for me.

The movie just knocks you off your feet. Not to subtract, not add. Aamir Khan is really a master, a real actor. He played SO that I had a burning desire to review all of the movies him because just watch face — fun already. Asin I really liked it looked more than worthy harmonious.

Music — on top. If you take the time to look at the translated lyrics, it will be very pleasant surprise for you. And music and word for a long time remain in memory.

The film is designed as a hitch. Original and sincere, he is surely worth

10 of 10