Ex Machina


In the center of the plot — a young man is hired by a billionaire who made his fortune on high-tech developments. The task of the worker — to spend a week in a remote location, testing a female robot with artificial intelligence.

Director:
  • Alex Garland

Stars:
Release Date: 2015-04-24
IMDb icon 7.7/10
  • Country: GB
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $15,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $36,869,414
reviews
Dedie Micaela
15 June 2015 | 06:40

Chamber statement — this is an interesting and challenging work, as you know. In fact, according to the idea is that all the action takes place in a confined space (often not so big square) and with limited, reduced to the minimum number of characters. However, there is in this its tangible advantages. In — first, you can save on the locations, the scenery, graphics and all that, that usually "fly" a considerable amount. In — second, disclosure and  the"filling" of heroes is a decent time limit. Personally I, immediately, of the examples of chamber cool projects coming up before the eyes of "Alien" by Ridley Scott. Here is really, truly atmospheric and fascinating film. But will not loosen in side.

Relevant and attractive idea with and the development of artificial intelligence have long firmly established cinema art scientific literature. Well, is haunted by the people's fear of the inevitable development of AI is future possible domination of their authors — people. And to play with fire continue. And want prickly. On really front for scientific — fantastic ribbons has a large. Would someone worthy of show and tell.

New picture of Alex garland, how can I see the reviewers dismantled for quotes. Try to look for some hidden philosophy in what he saw. To analyze all seriousness. It is useful and interesting. But whether it? Even I don't know the right thing.

Typical programmer in the performance of Donal Gleason wins in a lottery comes to not exactly a typical genius — scientist — the billionaire, the scientific complex which is located in such beautiful scenic places, working there — a pleasure. Eccentric billionaire has arranged for himself there insulated; mini — Paradise. In his spare time (and this, according to have him a lot), or man lifts a piece of iron and pounds the bag, or drink, how much you want to the blackout, or having fun with cute Asian "own production", which, of course, sawing, not whining, not threatens to leave this incorrigible biscuit (black envy envy). In short, "fully loaded". The boy also receives a special assignment — log in contact with a new creation of the employer — robot female under the name of Ava. It is noteworthy that only session Ava is seven. In fact, about the comparison unbalanced genius with God is also in the film is. A reason like you know, guys. In the film, there are several direct allusions to the on it. But they are primitive and already once was previously used in similar projects.

Vulnerable place ribbons — this predictability and the lack of any — the intrigue. She (the suspense) is lost after the first ten minutes. And unexpected thought-out finale of which I read and heard the mouth a couple of mates interest in the thing was absolutely obvious. Moreover, obvious even before the middle of the movie. Too imposingly approached the question of the script garland to the end, I could surprised to open his mouth and say, "this is Yes! Not expected, not expected.".

Strange and that per hour forty film Director and screenwriter, why — that not tried to breathe in the characters of his history which — fully interesting characters, thoughts and making them expressive for the viewer. Yes, they time of time push short philosophical and academic question, but of particular interest all that causes.

On hand project play — good music, which is very useful to mood the format of the picture is a normal camera work and, perhaps, everything. Of the actors I liked more — less is Oscar Isaac. Son Brendan Gleason to blame does not make much sense, so stand to play here there was nothing. Ordinary emotions in two — three granted by nature, suitable to the way — a type nerd. It's a shame all — the same. Guy seems may be better. And with meaning, the highlights of what — the chips? All superficial and obsolete already. fifteen — twenty years ago. With the other hand, the theme of coexistence and collision AI and man, in — I'm confident, can be told succinctly, interesting, original. It remains to wait for such a case in the cinema.

"From machine" — movie, like, and pass, but some — where, it hurt cleverly disguised and filed by the viewer on a shiny silver platter inevitable technological progress. In any never seen you, this product is not has to offer. You can watch, but not necessarily. Unless you affected subjects are very close. Thus, to be brief and clear, Alex Garland managed — has to remove that — of anything. Not want though, to call it complete trash and lazily concocted pseudocumene a fairy tale, but until what — the "delicious" and good here far. However, as you know, try — not torture. Maybe in another time. My rating five points. One exclusively for music.

5 10

Correna Joao
19 July 2015 | 03:49

Interesting and atmospheric story of control and independence. Nice shot and neat, the musical accompaniment perfectly complements the visuals and creates a great symbiosis of romance and science.

The script is certainly not perfect a scattering of technical and mathematical terms not always site, but it only emphasizes the imperfection of the human mind in trying to explain what he he has not understand.

This can be tolerated though because affected quite a lot of interesting questions for reflection on the themes of artificial intelligence and self-awareness.

Is it possible generally called intelligence, a system with hardcoded rules of conduct and functioning. Can such a system is to learn something new, for the framework of a pre-defined person of knowledge? (Kyoko)

If people to resist artificial intellect free from inhibitions and restrictions. How quickly, this case, the machine decides that man she longer needed? (ABA)

And in the process of reflection to get to the philosophy the essence of the problem:

Who is the right person: assistant or opponent?

The creation of artificial intelligence is a routine, craft or nepredskazuemo work?

The film itself is more emotional than technical. Not to find fault with the particulars, think about principle.

Must watch.

Ianthe Rangel
21 June 2015 | 06:10

Modern man from all forces trying to be smarter, faster, stronger, prettier; funny some creatures are ready for all to just being human. At this curiosity in that the definition of "person" not available due to the hypothetical common knowledge, and the only conditional proof of a thinking being is the Turing test — if someone can conversation to convince a man that is also a man, the test is passed. In the role of this "someone" are most often computer programs, but people are not hope once it iSkin.

In a secluded laboratory in a charming green corner of the earth live four: the genius — developed by intelligent robot, it is assistant/Secretary/maid — dumb Asian, a man with hand — tester of the scientist and finally, in fact that work in a conventional woman. Why the conditional? Because it is not woman not man is thinking nature which should confirm or refute our inspection.

So, four, the coexistence of which with the outset, is in tension. Humiliation and misunderstanding between a couple, curiosity and interest between other, hidden hatred and an unhealthy admiration for a diagonal between the 4 sides of this unique square. Chamber cinema, closed in frame glass concrete laboratory, is a detached observation of the possible development of a relationship between different individuals. Each of them seek to change their present situation, to go beyond his frame, to achieve something radically new. One craves for confirmation of their "divine" talent, the other simply looking for a change. But the main interest is the third, thoroughly studying the nature of man, all nuances thoughts, feelings and behavior to... what? Repeat it to yourself?

And with this point of view, it appears that test "person" — ability to lie and pretend to adjust the interlocutor, to justify its expectations. The desire to join the ranks of the people overrides, the goal — mimicry in human community — is a top priority. In these conditions about their own personal thoughts or desires nothing is known, however, the paradox is that the existence of this personality already is not questioned. To deceive, causing pain, a person can only.

Cold dispassionate movie, despite all the raging passions. The viewer as though at the same time with the Director the operator watches what is happening through the eyepiece of the microscope, watches with purely scientific interest, without any particular emotion. And even the answer on the main question — can be a robot, or at least to appear human — makes him feelings, but thoughts. No matter what shows history remains a mental workout than a real experience.

faq
How much has Ex Machina made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $36,869,414.
How much did it cost to make Ex Machina?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $15,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Ex Machina?
This tv-show was directed by Alex Garland.
What is the genre of Ex Machina?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Sci-Fi, Drama, Mystery, Best movies 2015, Best Drama Movies 2015, Best Thriller Movies 2015, Best Fantasy & Sci-fi Movies 2015.
Who starred in Ex Machina?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Domhnall Gleeson, Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac, Sonoya Mizuno, Corey Johnson.
What is Ex Machina IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.7.
When was Ex Machina released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2015-04-24.