While watching the movie now what I thought: how big is the share of chance in the creation of such tedious things? Because assume that it is someone's good will is beginning to be disappointed in the world. Coincidence? Yes, it is not inspected, but the deliberate waste of almost two hours the audience's attention is already a mockery.
But all began is quite interesting. The first half hour is quite brisk and promising. But then, when the heroine disappears Tanya Raymond occurring in the screen is associated only with strong healthy sleep.
The main question which I wish to ask the Director: why such a huge timeline? Minus 20-30 minutes, more action and from a second-rate film could make a decent movie.
It's that the actors are kind of trying, yeah and the script is not so that is very bad. Linear, trite? This Yes, but on the other hand this sin now every second film. Anna Kendrick and he tries very hard, but that's just anything it is not leaves. It is strange that one same year, she played in ‘I in the sky’ and in this film. It here is too stiff and not natural. About this episode of her career clearly better not to mention. Paul Wesley, looks much better in the role of Stefan Salvatore in ‘the vampire Diaries’ than here. Generally, in the connection participation in project I wonder why does the actor agree to play in such is clearly doomed to failure movies. When that himself Wesley to already appeared to ‘the Diaries’ and I think this infamous line in the filmography is well done. The only at whose appearance the action on the screen comes to life this Tanya Raymond, but its like not that not saves. A little drunk, dicey and her naughty the heroine makes in the narrative, though some emotions. And immediately after the disappearance of action is immersed in a somnambulistic state.
So, ‘somewhere’ — a boring and stupid movie. In fact is not need any actors, nor the Director, nor the more the audience. Take these 106 minutes on something more worthwhile.
5 out of 10