Don't understand the criticism in relation to film series Punks. Yes, they kind of, but not a slag. The creators show the lives of the British ghettos as see it for yourself. Yes, lots of violence and sex, but does the real life is not so. The plausibility of this picture is only a plus to this story.
As having missed the release of the third part, I to fill the gaps:
10 years passed since Sam had framed his uncle Tryphaena. He started a family, leading a quiet and measured life. His brother has become a musician and in one of performances it is made the attempt. On the site of the assassination was found a note, is designed to Sam. Someone desperately wants to see Sam's death.
Quite often used technique, where the negative becomes a positive character in the sequel. So was Yuri Boyko the continuation is Undeniable, so was a family mikaelson in the spin-off of the vampire Diaries. The and in the Punks. Sam in the first part was very annoying character. I remember waiting the whole movie to see how his face clean. But in the second part, which grated and removed as time in the role of Sam Noel Clarke, the main character is Sam. After serving in murder Tryphaena 6 he wanted to take um, but friends and Tryphaena uncle Curtis doesn't gave it this. Having dealt with them, he changed, but the past catches up with him. Clark showed very well in film that even grimy a desire for revenge a person can do as persons and not a wolf bite the throat of the offender.
The atmosphere in the film is amazing. I am delighted each part of the story. How the creators showed this dark side side of life in the UK. I watched a movie and enjoyed seen. Because I looked at real life, not that remove the Hollywood. This British film and different from American. Have them all turns out to be more real — fighting, emotions, pain, even sex.
In my opinion, Clark is a very cool finished this history. Many criticized it, saying I should have stopped at the second part. But what's wrong with the movie? One of the criteria for the evaluation of film for me this how easy was a film by browsing. For me the 104 minutes flew by. A very engrossing film, as and all history General.
The actors even go personally to not all played exactly how it should be. Especially good played alone Noel Clarke. Rage, love, pain — all the emotions on the face and all very plausible. As Director it also proved to be great, but he still producer, and screenwriter.
Good, believable movie, not for family viewing of course, but to see the film. Who have not seen the previous two parts — see all history. Very interesting story about love, friendship, revenge and pain.
Of 9 10
