Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes

What diabolical plans going to implement Maltazard to conquer the new world in which he moved to fraudulently? As Arthur, the rest of the world's Invisibles will be able to defeat the cruel Terrible? To save the love of a beautiful Princess selenia, Arthur is ready to join the battle against Maltazard Invisibles how in the world, and the real world...

Director:
  • Luc Besson

Stars:
Release Date: 2010-10-13
IMDb icon 5.5/10
  • Country: FR
  • Language: English
  • Budget: EUR65,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $33,885,979
reviews
Rodina Dwayne
04 June 2015 | 10:04

Honestly, do not going to write a review on this movie. But during the viewing, so many unspoken and left without answers to stay there is no more strength.

Remember, the first part was if not a masterpiece, the cartoon/film/underline pretty decent. Lovely Princess Village (the redhead is important), a noble boy. Arthur, touching, Granny and even this whole aura of mystery, fabulous and everything to this is attached. Well, it was very nice of you. Absolutely not childish (what are some only hip Village, which she did not forget to actively shaken, and pothead Max), but — cute, funny and with very a good dose of irony. "Yes, it is the Comedy!" — I thought. And went to see the second part.

The second part reminded me rather a kind of trailer for the finale of this epic. The film gained good acceleration, to then a Bang and a crash run off the mid-sentence, leaving the viewer with an open mouth and a silent question in his eyes. "Well, well all three parts have been removed", — I thought. — "Not necessary year;expect to continue". And went to see the finals.

And here here I was waiting for the same thing that I had a premonition even when viewing the second part, but was hoping to be wrong. And it — a complete failure.

First, the plot. There is probably a set phrase: "Plot? What plot?". So that is the issue I asked all the road. I sincerely tried to find a logical explanation for almost any actions of the main characters, because on the screen was going on some kind of heresy.

I was very sorry for the boy Arthur, who fell in love with the Samodurov the Village. Honestly, I wanted to kick and not once. Love? What is love? Why sweet redhead Villages, meeting with expected to all those damn ten moons, suddenly turned into a hideous and narcissistic person? Why in this through which you want: arrogance, contempt, surprise, anger — but not love? No, I'm not saying she had to ride kind of in love with a goat and hang on shoulder Arthur, but not pour mud, constantly speaking in the style of "I condescended to the idiot". And then she happily announce to him at the end of the movie that it is another ten moons. And for what, sorry?

I also it was a pity the son of Baltazar (Maltazard). As low, because he appeared in the story. Much better left prematurely deceased to the first part. And if Mr Besson wanted to raise here the problem of fathers and children, it is managed to do, quite frankly, not brilliant. At least because this topic is raised, not once. Where? Oh yeah, Star wars, a reference to which the same Besson not failed to insert closer to the end of this epic. "He is my father". Funny, Yes.

I want to commend the valiant police, which serves as a protection of this toy-decorative town. You saw the pride on their faces when they pulled up in epic tanks after the battle with Baltazarom? "We won, we have tanks." And care what. during the liberation of the city, and not was. And tanks... by the way, I understand that the tanks came out of the cinema...?

Oh, and Malthazar. No, he not pathetic. In such a nightmare not to see the truth. Especially after his experience surgeon — I think so even worse. And absolutely clear the obsession with grow and take over the world — touching corny. I do not understand one thing. Why Archibald and Arthur suddenly so concerned about his fate, when, having begun to return to their usual size, the suddenly appeared on the line of fire? Well and let him there smeared tanks at the fountain. He villain, no? Such a strange nobility... Or is also part of the notorious the circle of life?

About the schedule not say anything I will. It is suitable for high-quality computer games, but not the movie, sorry. Apparently, the entire budget went to... I don't know where did the entire budget.

The only thing that really pleased in all three films, so it's voice. Not Russian (no idea know dubbed in Russian), but English. Especially funny was to hear that Betamax (Barahlyush) — it's unforgettable Jimmy Fallon. Well and special thanks want to say to the actor Freddie Highmore. A fine actor, just wonderful, I saw him in many other films, and it causes only positive emotions. It's a pity that has managed to plunge into this movie, but otherwise, I think not is a one acting profession.

2 of 10

For Highmore Fallon.

Wendi Goldina
24 November 2010 | 02:17

The first part of "Arthur...," I watched ten times, the second — one times, and here "Arthur and war of two worlds" I I will probably revise again so hundred.

Sense that that on this film, I went to a cinema one. For the first time in my life I went to one movie, because my friends found the movie childish, and some to them interesting. But that I watched "Arthur..." almost alone in the cinema, nor almost ruined excellent viewing. The film begins with that we hear to pain a pleasant, male voice, which retells us the early events with Arthur and his friends, and is very happy, because two minutes we gave everything events occurring in the previous two films, to those people who do not watched the previous parts, understand what happened. After, we see people, Yes people, I do not like the Invisibles. We show the everyday life of ordinary people: Hiking in movies, Hiking, and other minor classes. And then we see a running insect that is certainly run from two-meter-terrible d &  here we and begin to see action and so much loved by us main characters. Of course, it must be attention of the most important heroes, brave, loyal and lovely Invisibles:

Villages. In the movie "Arthur and the revenge of Maltazard", the Village showed as a kind of spoiled young lady trying to show your some other unknown to us side. In this part I saw that beautiful and intelligent, brave Princess Village, which was once love. This girl, it is impossible not to remember after the first look at her. Her name unimaginable to forget, after the first pronunciation. Sweet, lovely, kind face with Golden eyes and a bit tousled, reddish hair. Agree, every girl wants to be like this dvuhmillimetrovy the Princess of the minimoys. Her character stands out when it hits Arthur in the face, because it doesn't told her how could to die because one bite play. With a reversal this moment weird... but very cute and are comprehensible to us.

Arthur. the protagonist of all films by Luc Besson. And he really people, but to fight him have in the form of miniput. In fact, he is normal miniput, with almost white hair and barely visible freckles. He not too many years, but he was able to defeat the terrible of Maltazard and save the world. In it not bad right?! I would say that the delicate relationship the Village and Arthur, always I was very pleased, and completely in this part was forced to smile broadly.

Barahlyush. As always funny and ironic, silly, pleasing to the eye. And this time it was with its round mechanism, which in any moment and balls are pulled out that gave Prakoso fall and the whistle came out, but it is was unnecessary. I can say that this miniput not give us to miss the whole film, not without it, the film was would be much more boring.

What can I say more? Russian voice is very pleased. I thought Philip Pale and Maria Kozhevnikova not handle task, BUT I was wrong. They perfectly conveyed the emotions of the characters with their votes for their thank you.

In summary: Yes, the film children. But it is possible to watch any person, because sometimes sometimes you have to look good, children's stories, because they teach children and adults something new and courageous. I Want to say thank you Luc Besson for that he left in my heart the Village, Arthur and Prince betameche.

10 of 10

Hedvig Kristen
07 September 2017 | 09:30

How many have been said about that the first part was quite possible to stop. But Luc Besson has set a goal — remove the trilogy. The failure of the second part is clearly not bother this famous Director, and he took off after the continuation, the final third part. Series finally came to finish.

The second part ended on the moment when Maltazard comes in the world of men two-meter giant, and Arthur, the size a bug with his loyal friends Baraclude and Village remains in the world of the minimoys. And here in the third part reveals the true intentions of Maltazard — he wants to enslave the world people, at the same time to destroy the world Invisibles (and a bit surprising that it is not set the execution of the second task immediately — like in its current size is it would not too difficult). But to stretch the film at the slightest an hour and a half, Besson have to insert unexpected intrigues, scandals, investigations. Here to your attention and the son of Maltazard, and hanky-panky with Arthur Village, throwing-lamentations of his grandfather Arthur, and frankly silly parents of the aforementioned character... it would Seem — do have to. But humor frankly not funny already there is only one thought: "Hurry it all ended." And when it's final, I want to be happy. Is it good or bad? Well... think for yourself.

Morality, meaning in love hardly will find. It just beautiful overexposed the final part of the trilogy. Schedule as always height, perhaps even better than in the previous parts. The visual component is really wonderful. Everything else (dialogue, plot, humor) on the below average. Also another important, on my opinion, nuance — in this part of the many shootings, fights, chases — and it costs 6+. Well, how about that?! Even though it and cartoon, but he would I set limit of 12+.

What I could find the pros in this "masterpiece"? First, it is the last part about Arthur (which is really a plus, because is enough). Secondly, from the film can be gleaned quite a lot of quotations, though in General, the dialogues and miserable. Thirdly, the graphics are simply divine! And last, the theme of "struggle" between good and evil is revealed here in the truest sense of the word.

P. S. If You already saw the second part, see the third, worse than not be. If you have seen only the first — it to stay, I assure You.

6 from 10

faq
How much has Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $33,885,979.
How much did it cost to make Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least EUR65,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes?
This tv-show was directed by Luc Besson.
What is the genre of Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Adventure, Animation, Family.
Who starred in Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Mia Farrow, Ron Crawford, Robert Stanton, Penny Balfour, Richard Davis.
What is Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.5.
When was Arthur 3: la guerre des deux mondes released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2010-10-13.