Despite what I realize the focus of the review, go here so just to fact I can't. I have long believed that on the website you want to add the tab "comments" on the movie page. Doubt: is it worth to watch the movie or not, read short reviews like: "the average film, and is better" or"I liked Hanks — handsome.". But if the reviewers are allowed to plow that fertile field, limiting their activity only by the bounds of decency, then I personally do not may be limited to a few words, the more case the movie, produced on me a strong impression.
A series of books on specific wild Robert Langdon — expert religious symbols, written in one of the few I recognized genres. As the easiest way to interest the reader? Give it a secret! The mystery of which he will wrestle with days and nights, or save yourself from this fate, read the book and answers to all he is interested in questions. On the basis of this, can safely come to the conclusion that the detectives — the most interesting reading. Such conclusions, of course, will be very very reckless, because not all like the different kind of pulp fiction, in which all salt is only mean, to understand who is who and what killed. Wanting to get some benefit from all I did, for a long time I have avoided such books party until came across a symbiosis of interest and use. Historical mystery, as under the genre of a detective novel meets all my requirements: it is the most primitive way, captivated the attention of the reader, giving him the very secret, but in the process of reading, time and again throws that certain information, thus fulfilling the most cognitive function — the cause of literature in principle. Historical it does not necessarily make time of the action, the plot may be associated with real, but would affect a particular historical phenomena or processes. It is the membership of brown's books to so my favorite genre, and explains the interest that I have to each film adaptation. Despite that review I write on film, I would like to rate "Angels and Demons", as a kind of phenomenon. The phenomenon is not only movies, but in books.
I don't care about the noise round the person of the author, I won't remember other, even more famous, it works, I will only talk about how that is that the book, where we here. "Angels and Demons" the embodiment of what I want to see fiction. The book combines all about what I have said. It interesting, provocative, and unpredictable. Bright representative of the genre, dictating trends to the development of followers. If YOU now give me a register for another website don't waste your time, I note that mention the book talking about the plot of the film! The picture embodied in life is a terrific story, which hides in itself a novel brown. He does your reader what should: attracts, enriches, intriguing and surprising. As well as and each page of the book, each frame of the film deals with the same! You will be satisfied with the impressions received. I please do not to perceive the presence of the film, as reason to read the book. Better to enjoy to the full, enjoying work that is entirely and completely satisfies me, as a reader.
Now let's talk about the film. Even if "primer" was the only book I have read, the film "Angels and Demons" I looked at any way! If the plot everything was initially clear that does not mean the film is bound to success in my eyes, because its success depends on many factors. order:
Director movie was made by Ron Howard. Initially, don't the most pleasing to me is the fact. Not can you deny the monotony of his works. I'm afraid of dynamic plot will turn into a hours "sleeping pills". In the first minutes of viewing my concern over. The movie was "faster" the most courageous my expectations! The first in my life "lecture at the history", in which I it was so hard to sit on the place. Intense... exciting... Bravo Ron!
Salvatore Totino — operator movie. Not matter that his record "Cinderella" and"frost / Nixon". To "Angels and Demons" I were grateful to him. only one film — "In another's number", but after, such film was already two!
Already in the cinema hall I realized absolutely not noticed who was composer movie. I thought over this because the music was just amazing. When he got home, and found out who my hero, I absolutely not surprised! Hans Zimmer great!
Many prestigious awards have a nomination for the "Best acting ensemble". Not heard that at least one award went to perhaps the best tandem 2009 — Tom Hanks and Ewan McGregor. To talk about that they played a great, anyway, talking about the colors of the Russian flag: you either is know, you are hopeless....
As a whole, awesome dynamic picture in unusual, but so I any, the manner of Howard. Skillfully shot film, with stunning music and a splendid cast, turned me from a satisfied reader in admiring the audience!
In fact as Oscar "best adapted screenplay" in the Bank of the film "Treasure", more worthy, as I think the candidate in the form of "Angels and Demons" remained in among the thousands of others undervalued, but this is not less quality pictures. I do not condemn those who have criticized the film as adaptation. Let me and I think that not the case when "better", but a me I agree. On the queue's "the Lost symbol", which is not strange, too, break the audience into two camps: happy "those who are supposedly versed in a good movie!". Instinct tells me that these groups will include those the same people who praised or not praised the "Angels and Demons". There are certainly one of two things: either like this type, either... In any case, I see what see I like it! A fine example of historical detective, embodied in excellent adaptation. From all of advantages, the main for me is that I personally him in love it. All what I mentioned above, makes a happy reader and the audience, satisfied from the life of man!