American pie:2 is the continuation of the cult Comedy, which has become the most popular and funny your sub-genre. As I was waiting for, the sequel turned out weaker than the first film, but not a lot. The movie is not have lost their thread, and tried to diversify the events. But everything order.
The storyline continues the story of several friends who have finished the first year in College. Each of them prepares for a specific event associated with my girlfriend.
The plot I liked the authors managed to keep the thread of the film, which is responsible for the atmosphere, plus all managed to bring some variety to the film, added new parts that fit very well into the storyline of the film. Earlier in the movie was less drama — more platitudes, then now most of these the proportions are reversed, the drum part got bigger and bigger, because if in the previous picture, the film is not had such, total drama, then she bigger. And many thanks to the writers for that left the"case" of such a character as "dad, Jimmy," he is a hidden weapon of the "Pie" filling which is always in his appearance brings joy and smile!
If we talk about the structure of this movie, I would said that saves him is the plot. The writers do not lost the thread of the atmosphere, which was created by the first part, and was able to correctly get away from uniformity. But not so rosy as it may seem, after all, when you watch the film is the feeling that somewhere a little bit have fallen short, and said, my humble opinion thought that could do better, could do harder, but probably not want.
Overall rating of the plot — Good!
The acting in this film, no worse than it was before. The actors are not lost her charisma, and some even managed to add and images I will tell you was more deep and expressive. I expected after the success of the first tape, the actors "Savestats" and will begin the traditional game on the decrease, but there were no it!
Jason Biggs — no lost the kind of attractiveness, is without star pretensions that too is a huge plus. Plays no worse than any better than was the first film, and it's great with but and sadly the same time, because progress observed. Its character did not has become dull, and on the contrary, the situation in he got, become very interesting and fun, but in plus the writers of the picture!
Allison Hannigan — conquered me in the first pie, plays a slightly different not good. No, playing not bad, but not have the enthusiasm and strange facial expressions like it was first and because it it struck me — their uniqueness and sort of fervently here that K not was, and the character of its a little went to dramatic part that is also very important to note. Guilt Allison into that her character is not an interesting was before — no.
Seann William Scott — we can say the face of this film, the actor added significantly, has become more masculine and charismatic. He in this film took all of my attention on myself, which unfortunately gave Allison Hannigan, but Seann with its role coped brilliantly and it and very playful and interesting character, a sort of courage raised the bar for total acting and pictures in this film.
Chris Klein — played a less interesting and less intriguing than before. He lost my thread, my rod, which was his character before. Here he became a character from which fact nothing depends this is very sad, because in the first film — all contributed to the cause.
Eddie Kaye Thomas — played incredibly great and as a certain actor of the second plan is undoubtedly the leader! I want to say that his character, I liked in the first film, but there's ed was not able to build it so to me this granted, there he was able to take in yourself, exactly what I wanted — intelligence, wisdom and strange one — that had carry imagine this character in the first film, here it is off course — Excellent!
I do not like showed himself to Thomas Nicholas, Tara Reid and Natasha Lyon. That for Thomas, so this character in the first was completely fused with the writers and has ceased to have special significance, the first film was a huge plus in that there everyone has contributed here take it character nobody notice it. Yeah and he played I will say very empty and no wonder — on message — dry "not tasty". The girls played pretty badly to consider in detail their don't want as those of the second plan.
The writers broke that was the main feature of the film — the versatility of the characters.
Overall rating of acting — Good.
The main star of the film — seann William Scott
On the side, I note that the emergence of Stifler's brother, has caused only negative emotions, then what makes this character — not funny and not interesting.
Stifler's mom appears very impressive and unexpected, which can be accounted for a plus.
With Stifler, again, the poor guy got in a little trouble, as it was here in the first part is a little ugly, but still competition!
Nadia as a character is very important, it is the visit has changed the lives of several people around, although initially I thought its a error.
In the end, before you very bad continued American pastries, which is no inferior the humor of the first part, and even surpasses it! Huge mistake of the writers, which upset me — is completely destroyed the diversity of the characters, now it's in the past, here now all the modern standards — all held on several characters and because as good in the first movie. Due to the fact that has destroyed diversity, respectively "killed" several characters, it also not is a good time. Fortunately though, I managed to keep the highlight of the Pope's Jimmy, I'm afraid of the movie this is a mistake. In this tape, tried a bigger emphasis on total drama, and I think it was a serious mistake.
Watch this movie, fans of the first part is mandatory, the second part did not inferior the humor of the situation set in the film even more fun and interesting than it was before, but here the rest of the alas not quite managed.
Cake a bit dry, but still not spoiled, at this — Bon appetit!
Thank you all for attention, me.
8 from 10