A.I. Artificial Intelligence

In the future, the world spin out of control global warming and frightening science, mortals live side by side with the amazing and sophisticated robots. But when an advanced prototype robot child named David is programmed to display of unconditional love, his human family members are unprepared for the consequences of such feelings. Suddenly, David finds himself alone in a strange and dangerous world. Through street robot David embarks on a quest for the riddle of his own origin.

Director:
  • Steven Spielberg

Stars:
Release Date: 2001-06-29
IMDb icon 7.2/10
  • Country: GB, US
  • Language: English
  • Budget: $100,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $235,926,552
reviews
Angie Clemente
02 October 2007 | 06:46

This stunning film is superivsion American cinema, the master of the genres of Steven Spielberg, on the contrary, instead of questions answers, this svego kind of sore the soul, the state of mind of the Director behind the whole period of the filming of this deep, soulful and do not let go so just the movie. Spielberg himself in the course of filming comprehends much to which had he never had to touch, and that is the fate of the entire humanity, redefining the relationship of family and family, solutions to unresolved problems. And Spielberg in head, and managed to find the optimal path for the future.

He just showed alarming video of what happens if everyone will roll in same lines same an increasing rate of development of new technologies in the process of global production. It shows how low humanity will fall already close soon. It is not empty: as most people think "geeks and geniuses", it facts mednolityh scientific research on all directions.

Because the Director deliberately, uncompromising not began to return to its tradition of a happy ending and decided approximately to accurately describe the the atmosphere of despair when words and actions become vain and zapozdalyj. The film depicts a future in which there is the place real, living and feeling, and the dominant is becoming artificial, made by hand of man. And this man was no different from their offspring, and here is what he sent all their efforts have learned to understand and to feel even better for him.

The final point is supplied in the end of the film — the death of a great civilization. For the film project was trying to tackle another master of American cinema — Stanley Kubrick, but get in the helm had Steven Spielberg. And it made its own significant changes. Haley Joel Osment in the role of artificial child, out any comparisons, I shocked by it artistry in this film. In General, deep, soulful and depressing drama, not similar one other work of Spielberg.

Aretha Weaver
07 January 2012 | 03:42

S. Spielberg piled in this film so much inaudibility that by the end of the film, and I really wanted to take the boy's plug and paste where — something like that would have shorted out forever.

1) We and explained in what is the essence or the purpose of such pseudocoelomates machine. We can assume that the designer, in a sense, the artist and creates a work of art, so to speak, "from the heart". But if the artist is not can kill a man, such a robot is quite a dangerous invention. With this issue is closely linked to neobyatnoy terrible experiment with a shares of this creation in the human family. Creepy because no moral restraints have a robot that — not noticeable. If the designer lost a son, then he was experiencing the father's love cyborg. And so it can cut not only a lock of hair, but what — something bigger. With thought about the improvement of robots is closely related to the idea of evolution of AI. But unlike "Bicentennial man" David ("Screamers" rule!) will not evolyutsioniruet, moreover it an obsession with the love of mother brings the idea of that get a robot with a purely human mental disorder. If it is a masterpiece, why not it but robots designed for destruction (feel pain, experience greater range of emotions and etc.) really cause pity and sympathy on his deathbed. In any case, no ideas of "fix" from them noticeable. In short, in the words of William Smith ("I robot"), "Why do I vacuum emotions?"

2) In the film too many friends, but a completely unnecessary detail: a surreal night of fun (cyberpunk), the city at night delights (relatively) reminds the town of the "Running on the blade", flooded, and then frozen Manhattan, flitting in every movie — disaster etc. All leads to the without the ill-defined main ideas.

3) Insert about alien looks like Skorospelka in the attempt to make the project participatory and kassaveti, making at this metal logs of a boy at least part. Well, kind of like for a happy ending. Honestly, running out of the moment when it is blocked amphibolite, I thought it was the finish. But there was. Spielberg showed us a short film about end of aliens. At this amused the reasoning of the aliens (what ... they are doing here?) about the greatness of the human spirit and mind. And that they have the technology to the level of miracles, no great spirit of knowledge, the desire to perfection the search for purpose? Anthropocentrism so it comes through.

4) the Presence of bizarre blunders: amphibole of course durable, but, considering the period 2 thousand years he did rot in salt water? It is not in the ice came. Resurrected in the result of experiments, aliens, people do not able to live more than a day — memory interferes. What is for the nonsense? I remember in"the Fifth element" not a problem was. Amazes Teddy considerate, helpful stitching himself yourself hiding in their holes pieces the hair of the mother (not his, of course). I had to do it the main character. The status of the androids in the film is not defined: most famous three robot laws? If so, robot can be accused of murder. If not, then it is almost a living creature, and the result of a global catastrophe such advanced machines would have to populate the Earth instead of people. By the way, do all straight die?

Conclusion: the film is not the loss of time in vain, because it is funny D. low and the incomparable Teddy, but for such a mastodon as S. Spielberg this is not enough. I can advise to preview "Bicentennial man."

5 from 10

Elyse Hospers
29 April 2011 | 05:12

Is it possible General artificial intelligence, if the mind and is the main criteria of life? "I think, therefore I exist" — said Descartes. So what then thinking distinguishes robots from humans? What gives the moral right "to destroy the cheap artificiality" and who is responsible for have not found a place mind?

In the Steven Spielberg film scholar who lost a son, created an experimental instance of robot child, whose main function will be the love of mother. You think the Creator of the wonder boy of movable humane considerations: how many childless families will have the opportunity to have a loving kid, pretty much like this!

However, there is something not allowing you to give even the most advanced robot man. It is a contradiction lies at the surface — the intuitive distinction between natural and artificial. In fact, the robots of the future — people with disabilities. Their main limit — the inability to marry frame is programmed roles. In same the main advantage: the boy who was made to he loved my mother, never stop it to love, never any other meaning is not fill it exist, but this very love. The tragedy in that it love so will remain a children's love, but not the love of the son, which is developing and modified.

The brutality with which destroy the robots is terrifying. This event, show, medieval punishment of creatures, whose only fault as at least questionable. Whether they have the right to life and happiness, if their only wine that they were created by others, but are able to recognize their limitations? "I'm special, I unique!" — shouts of desperation, artificial boy, seeing an exact copy of itself. And it awakened one cruelty. And to bear it shows that the same arrogant condescension: in letters to my mother, he opposes intelligent plush toy, claiming their own superiority, and right to human love.

"You found a fairy tale and followed dream" — explains to the boy about his maker view the wizard of oz. — "the Gift of human nature — ability to pursue your dream." But such lofty talk about the motivation is irrelevant. Have a little robot not be on the dream of. It created a built-in attachment to mother, he just following instinct that his cruel genius. Who really amazing, so it's a robot toy and "the latest model of the hero-lover." They are able to care, generosity and gratitude.

Overall, the film leaves a strong impression — not only through high-quality visual effects, but and thanks to complex moral problems, unusual plot twists and the workshop acting.

10 of 10

faq
How much has A.I. Artificial Intelligence made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $235,926,552.
How much did it cost to make A.I. Artificial Intelligence?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $100,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie A.I. Artificial Intelligence?
This tv-show was directed by Steven Spielberg.
What is the genre of A.I. Artificial Intelligence?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Sci-Fi, Drama.
Who starred in A.I. Artificial Intelligence?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Haley Joel Osment, Frances O'Connor, Sam Robards, Jake Thomas, Jude Law.
What is A.I. Artificial Intelligence IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.2.
When was A.I. Artificial Intelligence released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2001-06-29.