Sicario

Frankly, after watching "Enemy," Villeneuve I was expecting a lot more from his next creation. On the duration of the film I just not could understand that this got such high ratings.

But let's look at all the order.

1) the Film absolutely does not cling, does not cause any reaction besides yawning and boredom. Character the main character is poorly exposed and doesn't want to empathize. On the contrary, there is a desire to her to hurry up something happened. Emily blunt — is the worst choice for this role. From the main character, given her a policeman, as it is not expect in any danger, she will run a frightened face and hysteria at every possible occasion, not forgetting expressive to suffer incomprehensible reason.

2) the Film is excessively tightened. Dialogues, in which water more than the diploma of the average student, even and diluted with a huge amount of pauses. If you from this not going to sleep, the creators of the film will please you periodic demonstrirovalsya tracks and cities, and also the picturesque landscapes of America and Mexico under the mournful and depressive tune. If you remove all this senseless void, the movie would be one hour.

3) it is not clear parallel to the opening of the second story of the family a corrupt COP from Mexico. To which is at all? What the semantic load? So I have empathy for them? I absolutely not want to do it. Cut out all this part, the film did not would be poorer. But it added a full fifteen minutes!

Boring, uninteresting, boring, empty, boring.

I must say the movie I loved it. And not matter what the plot is quite tedious and the film couldn't have enough drive. However, there are important — the feeling of tension, you expect going to happen next, who these people actually (Brolin and Benicio) and all this end

Separately want to say about Josh Brolin. Like me is a one dimensional actor, same "Old men not the place," he played exactly the same guy — facial expressions, posture and so everyone is the same. Another thing that the actors of such a plan, I personally like. Emily blunt played perfectly familiar. Benicio just beautiful. At his initiative, the hero of the film was the few words (originally the writer wrote for him a lot more replicas) and it's catchy. Here he should be. Guy case. Nafig these words.

Now that touches of morality. What it's a tough world obviously, I think, all more or less sober people. And"bad" (criminals) and"good" (police, intelligence services) is used for the realization of its goals not always humane methods. Because it works best. Because reality dictates its rules, or rather, who stronger and dictates the rules. But here is a heroine like Emily blunt lives in parallel dimension — she was surprised not matter what works in the FBI learns that they say you can effectively act as not under the law. And it is surprising. Whether it is a schoolteacher or a dentist, raised in a refined civilized family, still believe you, but she's an FBI agent and her innocence seems to be some misunderstanding, as if she takes his place, though, and has to such work skills. In General, the film is a lot of emotions, so watch it interesting!

What if Volodya Sharapov and Gleb Zheglov to throw in our time, to move from Moscow in Texas to charge to deal with the Almighty Mexican drug cartels?

More advanced: if you also Sharapova to make a woman? It got, Sharapova? (not to be confused with the tennis player).

Sculpt something intelligible and starting from this story came from Director Denis Villeneuve. It the film "the Killer" was just starting to rent on wide screens, and has managed to gather a good cashier, and lots of positive criticism. Vosmerochka on"IMDb" speaks for yourself.

However, however, however...

My experience with this movie began in the cinema foyer with a careful study of the poster for the film. On the poster brutal man Benicio del Toro (our Zheglov) is a gray mouse in the name of Emily blunt (our Sharapov-a). Somewhere in the background looms Josh Brolin (Zheglov-lite).

Benicio is good. I first thing I noticed on his stylish haircut and glasses a La Neo from the Matrix. Good!

After Emily blunt Benicio to translate the look just not want. Some beam dull hairs, frightened bulging eyes and slack jaw give the fact that it is clearly a random person and in the fight against drug trafficking, and in this film.

Although, it's certainly not only the actress, although the casting Director should be fired. The case in the image Sharapov-Oh.

Spoiler I will be the plot of "the meeting Place cannot be changed" all remember. Briefly so: Zheglov believes that "a thief should sit in jail" (transfer in landscaping — "narodila must lie in the grave"). And Sharapov convinced that everything should be on the law.

Okay, the juxtaposition of good. But! To oppose each other have comparable magnitude. It is, must find spit on a rock to flying sparks. Zheglov in his leather jacket and front-line veteran Sharapov in army uniform — every bearer of some profound principles, hard and recorded by scars on the body. Braid and the flesh. Ice and flame.

Emily blunt — not stone. Rather wool. And what would happen if KOs will find on the wool? It we see the performance of the Director Veleva and the characters — Benicio and Emily.

Yes, Benicio wanted to spit on the law. Have their justice and its own set of concepts, embossed on the tattered fabric of the soul with the blood of loved ones. He realizes that around the wolves, and your only chance to survive — have fangs tree than others. This its true, bastardina eligible for exist.

And Yes, Emily — wool. Have her shoulders no nothing at all (in any case, the Director us nothing shows) that would its recurrent tantrums (such women!) on the topic of "why are we do not keep the law?"

In the end, it "confrontation" is not looks like a collision of characters. It just slurping strong soldatskogo boot in the mud. The mud out there somewhere in the bottom chpokaet, but all pohren. In particular, pohren audience. No reviews of in the hearts of the audience the position of the heroine of Emily blunt not cause can. Because Benicio del Toro cleans our world of the bad(very bad) people. And Emily Blanc their protects without any reason. Why? Why? — we asked. And find no answer.

Even (even!) if blunt played the lawyer who defends drug Lord in hopes of getting million fee — we would understand it. Money — it's motive. The more — dirty money.

This position Sharapov-Oh, actually zero reasons. We can only guess why she this is correct. Seen only one of variant: Emily blunt was good in your police Academy, I got a's in law is now trying to justify the red diploma. Unconvincing. Crap. Not believe.

Well, and of course, the scale of the actors give about itself to know. Benicio just crushed a colleague at the film. So well as his character passing of all who stood his way. In the cake.

At the same time, I'm not want to criticize the movie. As a show he is cleared is quite good, especially in the first part. To the end, when the story oblique wool, the intensity weakened, but the less to watch a movie is. At least to make sure — our Sharapov better.