10 Cloverfield Lane

Typical, but a bright representative of the chamber of cinema, which is not requires change of locations, the abundance of characters big time. Even declared budget in 15 million dollars spent on a few scenes and actor fees. "Cloverfield, 10" confidently answers almost a rhetorical question, but can the film is shot in a couple of areas to keep the screen to create intrigue. Definitely maybe and enthusiasm enough to an hour and a half up to the final credits.

The main character finds himself in a small room in an underground bunker, the owner of which selectively responds to the exciting for the girls questions. This is a brief explanation of the plot perfectly characterizes all the further chain of events, the keynote of which can be assigned to the word distrust. The seed of mistrust that was sown by writers in the beginning answer for increasing the degree of tension. That the chamber bounded by the walls of the underground bunker, only adds to the sense of doom, of uncertainty.

Another interesting feature of the film — it is a balancing act between fiction and Thriller. In this is undoubtedly a significant achievement to be asleep. John. Abrams. Its patronage, in particular, the share of intrigue that had been built around the premiere, provided the film a feeling of the movie category A. as for the cast, but John Goodman on the middle of the seventh decade draws its appearance to the screen, giving a great performance.

7 out of 10

The filmmakers all done right — for the past 103 minutes the sphincter is not even trying to decompress and so to the final credits — the suspense is phenomenal.

The script leaves a lot of questions and does not one clear answer that in General no negative, does — this approach makes Cloverfield what he is in fact thought — the film is a mystery, he has been from the beginning of the campaign and left to the end. The aura of mystery literally in all — until the personality of some of characters. And no clear answers. In this whole Cloverfield 10, he should be the authors now just have to develop this token — to feed the viewer a frightening unknown. It is a movie where the answers to your questions are you give yourself, but the truth is not no one not know.

And Yes, even the film is based on the retired grandmother JJ, the picture looks very bad, sometimes even impressive, Intrusive CG things place very stylish.

The film is definitely part of the Cloverfield universe, so to speak, and specifically, I personally it seemed obvious connection 10 CL "Cloverfield", the authors is that included in a picture of great homunculus of the first part, and not jabbed us to his nose, to didn't look quite so obviously helplessly with them. Instead, the film as he would suggests everything in existence that it is the same cinematic reality that and Cloverfield in 2008, but not being a direct continuation.

But the sequel is sure to be, now there no doubt. And I'll wait.

8.5 out of 10

it's highly recommended!

After not perfect "Cloverfield" or same "Mostro", after 8 years of the screen comes the long-awaited sequel, which all I forgot, but suddenly remembered. Initially I was a choice: whether to go on "Mostro 2", or on the domestic Thriller "Route, built". Well, how was it possible to choose between these two pictures? So I rushed to book tickets.

The first film I seemed too predictable. He was me boring and stupid, voobra in many clichéd moments, but something it was. Mixed emotions, but gave up hope on a sequel, though, and after all this time. Perhaps monster can be called the best film in the genre mockumentary. He frightened, discouraged and enjoyable, but the end ruined it all impressions. About the second part, I learned only recently.

It was worth the wait.

The first film does not immediately put us in the paint and dipped in atmosphere of the terrible events. The second in contrast, after 10 minutes we already alert that the question to believe us or not. I went to movie a friend who does not watched the first part. For it is was a novelty, he didn't know what happened the reality. Very disappointed that people do not been. We sat alone in the hall. The most disgusting spoiler for me was the first part, because in the second presents the intrigue lies precisely in this: and do something?

The atmosphere and has you, pressure from all forces. I feel a bunker with them.

History does not the banal, the young girl who escaped from issues, gets in a car accident, after which it turns to hopper two young people.

Gets really creepy. Becoming mentally ill from strong acting, and the constant question: do not deceive Howard our heroes? Have all the characters have secrets that will soon lead you to a logical end. To I didn't pay attention on the details, but I should have. Dan Tractenberg is constantly focused on the smallest details, whether it be earring on a photo or a bottle of wine.

I tried to relax, but constantly trembled from fright.

The actors are very impressed, in Mary Elizabeth Winstead I am convinced 100%, and received the end. John Goodman — one the expression made to shrink to place of anxiety. Bravo!

If you have not watched the first part, but learned the second and completely want to go for her movie, suggest not to watch the first film. Also disappointing was the second trailer. Again, the spoilers, but I was expecting a very different ending.

I hope to continue. And continue no longer I'll watch the second rollers, after a great original of the passages. Definitely a breakthrough! Thank you J. J. Abrams!

PS: "make No mistake in choosing what to watch friends!"

Of 9 10