Kung Fu Yoga

Professor of archaeology Jack si waiting for a truly exciting adventure. Need to solve a lot of puzzles and find treasures of the ancient Kingdom. For the greatest treasure hunt in history, the more powerful crime syndicate. Jack along with the team have to show skill and ingenuity, and to win the Princess ' heart.

  • Stanley Tong

Release Date: 2017-01-28
IMDb icon 5.2/10
  • Country: CN, IN
  • Language: Mandarin | English
  • Runtime: 1h:47m
  • Budget: $65,000,000
  • Revenue: $357,263
Farrand Shepard
14 April 2017 | 08:48

The plot is very sad, and largely borrowed from some better Indiana Jones (as in one of the episodes literally says in plain text). Here and scientist, archaeologist, and ancient legends, and the ancient fetishes and the ancient secret temples, and even a special staff with a precious stone, through which must pass the sunbeam. At this concept study plot moves performed significantly worse than  "Indiana Jones" (and worse, it would seem, and nowhere), so this film actually is beyond the possibility of comprehension. The Oscars could be giving the rampant idiocy, but such nominations have not yet idea.

Any taken by the heroes of the film solutions was the height of idiocy, but this was immediately denied by the implementation of data solutions that looked the fact of even greater idiocy. Take, for example, the episode with the training kung fu in the ice. People came over distant lands to find treasure, but for some reason needed to beat each other, risking injury and it was impossible to work; but there are still a number of wandering pack of hungry wolves and Laggards in the way of valuable professional leave without using one; suddenly the wolves cleverly being snowballed and immediately begins drilling through the ice where no out of nowhere who undertook drilling rig... something like logical, consistently and thoughtfully developed each episode and the entire movie in the whole, left the end, only one big question: "what is this happened?!" But the viewer is constantly "wanted to impress the breadth of scope", showing the fashionable use of technology in the form of flying drones with GPS, by gongs on expensive cars and smashing them in the trash, then waste continually risking his life. And tellingly, none of characters don't even did that anything to worry about material or criminal liability. "At whose the expense of the Banquet" — remained frame. Of course, without a rich picture of the modern adventure film is generally no sense to remove, but when the actions and behavior of the characters stressed debility, it makes no quality of the final product.

It's strange, but usually the Jackie Chan it character shows typical male aggressiveness in love, most his enough, flirtation. In other cases, he finished with only teenage affectation and a suspicious modesty, as Director of Japanese anime. Probably romantic female personages such behavior may even like it, because leaves a lot of freedom for imagination. But for the role of a brutal man in the movie is looks very strange and ridiculous. In this movie, all the same often the character of Jackie Chan behaves with as silly-shy teen that so or in which did not develop. As usual, however.

About so called kung fu. Viewers accustomed to the fact that where Jackie Chan, there the default assumes the presence of brisk fights, dangerous stunts and fun. Everything here is made exclusively in the form of farce and absurdity: fight limp, boring tricks, and no fun. generally.

Special mention deserves the "zoo" of this film. Here it has a lot of things: lions, hyenas, snakes, wolves (only what remember). Of course, all "clay", paint with the help of computer technology. And all nothing but treatment animals the film is an additional red marker identified characteristics of heroes: idiots. When a normal person wants Leo not the crippled, it tries to stay away from him. But not then need to add gas and in the next 10 minutes Leo in the back seat you don't bother.

The ending actually surprised, because as in the cheesy Indian movie, suddenly began a General dance and synchronized affectation, where in the same row stood, even those who just polished each other's snout. It like hints "world peace" and"seasonable air", but the movie messed up a lot. (Although, is it possible in a similar way to ruin a bad movie, it is still a big question). In the end, the ending was a crumpled and literally — patentovannaja because the fate of the villains and their intentions remained unresolved, and about remorse or eliminate the motive to say forget.

Even with meaning of the film is very tight. I and do not understand what it wanted the antagonist to return the wealth or to gain power? When all rushed to dig pocket knives gold statues could think of the stupid desire to fill their pockets, but in all the rest of the conversation was about some sort of higher meaning and something like the restoration of historical justice... the Motivation of the other characters too big question: for what "yoked" so called Princess? for that it was necessary to risk the life of the main character? why risk it available?.. As they say, need to look for malice where all simply explained by stupidity.

The name used with stressed commercial purposes, no connection with classic "Armor of God" is not.

Conclusion. Rare stuff! However, nothing special from Jackie Chan have a long time coming not have the film — another proof of it.

3 of the 10

Rozanna Bakki
17 May 2017 | 09:16

Bollywood often makes us happy complete trash that we watch. Not entirely of course. There are craftsmen that we cut the fierce treshachok, which we and enjoy. With recently started to conquer the bollywood world markets film production, leaving the framework India alone. The experiment still shows itself very well. Indian films collected good money in rental liked by the audience. So as we sometimes you want selected TRELOCK. And here Indian cinema decides to connect with a Chinese. On the main role tout Jackie Chan. And that's all other participants in the project, alas, but I do not known. But and Jackie with his incredible charisma already is the reason to go. On it is always a pleasure to watch. So that movie was not only to be a child of two countries, but and inherit the culture of each of them. From here and title "Kung fu Yoga". Yes, no "Armour of God", they nothing to do with it. I might pobombit at this, but everything is already have webmiles, so that there is no special meaning. I actually waited with movie and "Big" is generally skipped past him. But at  the"Guardians" went 4 times. So what I'm saying? Oh yeah! In the film is a mixture of kung fu and yoga. They say together the combination of these two techniques gives you incredible power. But really is not much, to be honest. So as the film scores on the subject at the first opportunities. And remembers exactly when it will need to advance the plot.

Major drawbacks of the film — this script, installation and production. The thing that the film sets the condition in the stage in the next scene — this condition loses all meaning. Condition can be all that you want. For example, our hero's fighting against evil uncles and defeats them. We show it victory suddenly next our frame character is associated. How? When? How? And well if it was once for the movie, but no. It is constantly repeated. Somewhere in less than somewhere in more. This laziness on a cosmic scale. Characters can disappear and appear out of nowhere in nowhere. Plus all characters are exorbitant for an hour and a half film. And then the way lies something. The film looks so if it gutted. Straight pieces of torn fragments. Installation — curve inconsistent. And about production. UV. Well, I'm sorry. 65 million dollars — this is a big budget, especially for such a film. But the Director him to cope. Yes how so? Why are the graphics so bad? What not with this tiger? Why real cars for a second can turn into machine "need for speed: underground". It as blasphemy.

But I film came. It on the fan. No, it's objectively a bad movie. Awful script, poor staging, poor installation. But damn. What he's hilarious. All so stupid, unrealistic and silly that becomes ridiculous. Yeah and there are a couple of good references. With reference to theme. I don't know why the film curve fitting but it adds more fun, because you turn to the other smiling face like this: "Chago?!".(This is not justification) And this question will pop up constantly and always with a smile. But I saw people in the hall. I saw they all took in seriously from what was in anger. And I don't blame. In same "fast and furious" has excellent production and consistent Assembly, and here ... Except that, on Jackie all will be happy to see. Not all, most, but you understand. The other actors don't remarkable. Except that, sexy girl. On whose sexuality built some points. What fine for Comedy average scall. To sum up, this is a bad movie. With a bunch of problems with the technical side, a poor script and bad production. But you will come if you like rubbing. I all.

5 from 10

Damaris Hallie
12 May 2017 | 07:38

Watching this film caused downright nostalgic for those movies the zero years, when the lack of quality computer graphics were replaced by long melee battles, but with this year got a sense of humor, accompanying all scene his participation.

This film, of course, has a built in itself, computer graphics, and new ways of shooting, but it still same the spirit of simplicity and lightness, full of frivolity and childishness, for we love movies with Jackie Chan — in contrast to the rough cruelty and bloody slaughter.

What else it scary wolves to be saved snowballs, and choking the person to ask the question: "What's with you?"

Another picture with Jackie Chan all full kung-fu, fun flips and jumps, not very well done stunts (well seen in many places as they are unnatural flying in the jump) — in General, all as always. A beautiful Princess, a charismatic villain, for centuries under the nose had lain the treasure for the handful of morality and a pinch of philosophy — in the end, a fun, unpretentious movie.

Liked the pictures life of India, their culture and traditions; the dynamism of the plot and the rapid development of events does not can not delight — for this genre slowness nor what is; the original jokes and various references add to the hilarity.

Of course, Jackie Chan it's not one that before, to argue with this is meaningless. But the era of these meters is indeed taking place: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Jackie Chan — they get old, but the said it's nice that until fully away from business. All with these people of the whole epoch of cinema and leave them very sad.

And this film will provide a great opportunity to just relax, not think about extra laugh the adventures of a Chinese archaeologist in the style of good old zero.

6 out of 10

How long is Kung Fu Yoga?
2h 27m
How much has Kung Fu Yoga made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are $357,263.
How much did it cost to make Kung Fu Yoga?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $65,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Kung Fu Yoga?
This tv-show was directed by Stanley Tong.
What is the genre of Kung Fu Yoga?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Adventure, Comedy, Mystery, Best Mystery Movies 2017.
Who starred in Kung Fu Yoga?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Jackie Chan, Disha Patani, Amyra Dastur, Aarif Rahman, Miya Muqi.
What is Kung Fu Yoga IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.2.
When was Kung Fu Yoga released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2017-01-28.