2012

According to the Mayan calendar, in 2012, the planets of the solar system will appear on the same line with each other, which will lead to global natural cataclysms: the strongest earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions will make the country and the entire continent in ruins. Recently, scientists have confirmed that this myth could become reality.

Director:
  • Roland Emmerich

Stars:
Release Date: 2009-11-13
IMDb icon 5.8/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English | French | Tibetan | Mandarin | Russian | Hindi | Portuguese | Latin | Italian
  • Budget: $200,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $791,217,826
reviews
Damara Trey
15 November 2009 | 09:07

Very awaited release of the film. The tickets were booked for the week before the in the center of the room. The best places. For 10 minutes to the beginning of the film has been bought popcorn and Pepsi. In the purse prudently lay the handkerchief on the case of tears, who, how it then seemed, was inevitable.

And that same?

Like:

- the special effects. Our world was shattered beautiful and fascinating.

- John Cusack. Not sure would go on this movie, if not him was the main role.

- lyrical moment of farewell of father with son. It was the only moment in this film when I was almost began to cry.

- Russia is the first of the countries decided to be human. A small thing, but nice.

- I almost have forgotten: the collapse of the statue of Jesus Christ. I somehow, it seemed that the creators of the special effects have long wanted to have to remove IT.

Not like:

- hackneyed plot. Writer; his former wife, still loving it; problems with the son of a divorce; a new friend's wife and etc. Hey, writers, let something new, huh?

- extreme unlikelihood. Excessive even. The drift of the protagonist is not the most maneuverable car on the crumbling road; in the second time in my life sat down behind the wheel Gordon, of course, was able to avoid all obstacles etc. To infinity.

- horrible/ugly/some exaggerated emphasis from the Russian, Yuri, Tamara and others like them. I watched the movie in the original, because it is an incredible way cut ear. Well and the characters are exactly the same as their accent (awful/nasty/some exaggerated).

- the last part of the film. When we have went to about  the"ark". Very pleased with the dialogue through the camera:

- Oh, you alive! Have me your daughter!
- Oh, Lily, you live!
- And where is my brother?
- I then, Lily, it's okay!
- Mommy!
- Lily, I'm so glad you're alive...

Something like this. When condition this time General, people are dying. And in General, it would be nice to go along with their been saved.

Pleased parting with the son

- Well, dad, I want to help you!
- You already helped me so much... I remember when your sister was born...

Well, of course, but why not to talk finally? Saving the rest of humanity can wait... Honestly, this moment was for me the beginning of the end. After was only laughter.

In General, the last part of the film is full of SUCH absurdities that has crossed all the nice and the dark, what sowed in my soul the first part is devoted to direct mass destruction of humanity.

So I went out of the cinema with a big smile on his face, disturbing thoughts about our impending death is not was in sight.

Maybe this was the idea of the writers/Directors/producers?

I doubt that, but believe it's still a want, for otherwise, the film does no work.

My assessment is 4 10

Magdalene Zora
03 January 2010 | 05:36

Disaster film that will change your imagination, make the brain blaze and eye — cry. Six billion people will die in the living will remain only the main characters, dogs are the main characters, the animals of all the world (two pieces from each) and a chosen procreation bright minds of mankind, such as sheikhs, tycoons, presidents, Prime Ministers and other "pundits". All correct, it should be. You have to be incredibly naive to believe that if 2012 really will break the end of the world, we with you, my friends, will take in such that the ark.

Striking another. Striking in Paphos have saved (count) of people in the ark, with which they pronounce their noblest speeches. This scientist-ebony, who fiercely "unharnessed" about your innocent victims Indian friend quoting the imperishable thoughts of the writer, published in four hundred copies. All it is very strained. If so, to be honest, to be honest you need to the end. "Yes, we want to survive, we want the survival of our children. We don't care about the rest. And in principle, not have to worry. So we won't endanger all those in the ark." Somehow approximately so. But not that the humane crap that was rushing fifteen minutes with screen the result was almost killed the entire ark. And it turns out some double standards: do not want to die, and to about us, not bad I thought, I'm afraid.

Next on the items:

1) Praise the fortune that accompanied the main character for the entire film. And in the water that the brave fellow not sinking the fire does not burn. And the earth cracked round him, mesmerized in his incredible luck. And the pits themselves out, otherwise, how can explain what it or a single hand on the edge of the hole, holding on, got out of it (!) and caught up with the plane (!).

2) I like John Cusack, but how can play writers-losers with family problems?

3) by the Way, family problems, quite in the spirit of Hollywood. The write girl, and this young kid who knows the essence of all things, but there is not requested. Anyone else? Stupid woman, to still not understand its "chuystvah". It a friend (a new friend). And of course, the writer-loser.

4) Most worthy character I had Russian oligarch. He really the one who is alien to the whole fluid in the ears Paphos. He wants to live, wants to survive it. children. The rest is purple. To not understand why can't some resent the fact that he left changing him a mistress. Probably the best of the universal concepts of morality in the eve of the General End of the world, he had to pet her head and pull the ear of her dog.

5) the President, who is all body and soul despises for the people I better keep silence. About daughters also silent. Twenty days from day of the dead Batey passed, but it is forgot him, and, as neither what is not used soorudit with"scholar" high humane qualities.

6) the Ending of this spooky stamping is freaking nuts. People without a single tear in net simple eyes came to stare at the cloudless sky. A girl (ABOUT a MIRACLE!!!!) ceased to be written!!!

3 of the 10

Estele Joselyn
21 November 2009 | 04:18

Reading a large number of reviews full of disappointment, I couldn't understand what happens. Especially after he looked the most anticipated film of this year: because on IMDb he has overtaken even all well-known `Avatar`. So that my opinion or we all zazhralis or I'm not really much.

don't waste time, kid. The end is near!

What Emmerich made his best film disaster for me, obviously. Of course, anyone can I say that similar to the end of the world not possible, but here in `day after tomorrow` all were science. But Lord, we all adults — who said in news not to be trusted. The main problem of man in Western traditions, on the moment — but in the framework of his limited, `scientific` and`real` representations of the world, this is what do not allow them to see many amazing things. Idyll — the cooperation of joint spiritual practices and of science, but we to go for a long time. To the same for me, `day after tomorrow` was valuable its scientific validity, and spectacle. And in terms of entertainment the movie 2012 for me much better the next day, you could even say that this film is its improved version.

- Careful! See eggs break!

Even the element of drama that is not very much succeeded Emmerich and get to a good level. Although it is possible to the safe way 4-m this item will be sent in a certain direction, so all for me the main characters of the film are in not all writer performance John kusaka, and not a scientist Chiwetel Ejiofor and not plastic surgeon Thomas McCarthy, and a Giant Tsunami, volcanic Eruption, Fissure, Crust, the Continents Shift and Global Earthquake (especially earthquake).

- What a great plane!

- Of course! He also Russian!


Russian here is generally a separate issue. In General, are fairly solidly and virtually no cranberry: with Russia in teeth the balalaika armpit no one jumped. And not even it bears on bicycles. The truth is our President is still — the spitting image of Brezhnev.

The rest of the many characters, which usually in such movies only for beauty and open up not have time, look here it is sanity and get from the viewer experiences a fraction.

- Wow! This is awesome!

A film with your task — entertainment managed to work well — looks at one breath. I think, long queues in the ticket office of the theaters will not run out soon. Well and what ended up well (for the most part the characters) is attributed to the shortcomings I can't — people always need hope. Although gaffe noticed probably everything the Director does not pay attention to that when the crash of civilization all continue to operate cell phones, but the Apocalypses have a beneficial effect on the child's urinary system. Although seemingly all should be quite the opposite.

However my rating of 9 10.

PS For the way home, carefully looking out for cracks in the pavement and if found then tried to avoid.

faq
How much has 2012 made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $791,217,826.
How much did it cost to make 2012?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $200,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie 2012?
This tv-show was directed by Roland Emmerich.
What is the genre of 2012?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure.
Who starred in 2012?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: John Cusack, Amanda Peet, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Thandie Newton, Oliver Platt.
What is 2012 IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.8.
When was 2012 released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2009-11-13.