Marshall


The film tells of a bright page in the biography of Thurgood Marshall, the first African American in the ranks of the Supreme court of the United States. At the beginning of career, he gets a controversial case about a black chauffeur, charged with its rich boss with a sexual assault. Young Marshall teams up with a young lawyer-a Jew in an era of racism and anti-Semitism to make a sensational statement in defense of the rights and equality of citizens.

Director:
  • Reginald Hudlin

Stars:
Release Date: 2017-10-13
IMDb icon 7.2/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Runtime: 1h:58m
  • Budget: $12,000,000
  • Revenue: $8,891,678
reviews
Marianna Wilt
22 October 2017 | 06:53

I will not hide — about the film I found out by accident, and its description alerted me. From synopsis wafted hackneyed "oskarovskoy" issues, subparagraphs "racism" and"anti-Semitism". And I hide your, to put it mildly, a cool attitude to pictures "12 years of slavery", "Django unchained" and others like them. "Marshall" is played their field, but quite its like and came to the time the title character.

What's say — session I went to absolutely delighted, not managing to form in the head compliments and voice them. Praise me I want everything, but I wish with humor. Surprisingly, because talking about bar a procedural COP show with a distinct ethical message! It works here on all fronts. — pulls heroes from Paphos, softens awkward moments, fill potential pauses and not just gives the viewer get the hump from the mud of the last century. And humor this not only appropriate, but and cool. I would call its British-American.

But some jokes fed you will not. And here to help us comes the story to unravel and to predict which is not so easy (and this sin 3/4 modern works). The film plays with a viewer makes through the development of case or just look forward to the appearance of each of the nuggets of information. And this story is more saturate the title characters-the lawyers that are so different detailed consideration, but generally very similar. From Bosman and the reptile had left a great tandem, the chemistry between them is downright oozes through the screen.

Also pleased with the interesting directorial finds (you'll understand when you view of what was going on), installation without hesitation and high-quality playback of the entourage of those for the expense of authentic costumes, decorations and, of course, music. In an atmosphere immersed with head and catch light dissonance when exit hall.

Not that I do not want — I can prikopat to "Marshall". I doubt that this review of contrast the above pictures. It simply stunning movie that deserves your attention. Whether to him a statue? I would not began to posluwat art.

Dory Strawn
22 October 2017 | 02:06

Today visited the movie movie "Marshall" — in the movie, by the way, I was not long ago. Periodically opened the poster, but somehow nothing cling, and then I watched the trailer and went to buy a ticket.

"If you need freedom, you have to fight for her"

The film is based on real events. Lawyer Thurgood Marshall (who later would become the first black U.S. Supreme Court justice, who later won a case that resulted in the abolition of segregation in schools), taking with him another lawyer in the first to the word Jew, fighting in court a very loud, controversial case defending a black chauffeur, charged with her rich boss in sexual assault. It is clearly controversial and shaky, but on the side of the prosecution is racist. And meanwhile — is 1941, Europe has been swept by fascism.

The main character has a strong charisma, sense of humor and quite a human shortcomings, and yet it has a purpose. The law — him he asks. it truly masterly. His fists, however, also knows how to wave, or not impossible to survive where the laws do not care.

His companion involuntarily — Mr. Fridman — interesting too. He was not engaged in criminal cases, quite content with his reputation as a lawyer who knows how to play on Rihanna to break up some insurance. And now one of them — those who is fighting, if not against the whole country, vs. 2/3 so sure.

Almost the entire film is built on the trial, I personally and the profession was also very interesting, nor the drops do not boring — two hours fly by in a flash. And was with a friend, do not a lawyer, her too terribly much.

It seems that the layout is classic "bad-good", but not quite so. Although all this classic layout is not broken, but still a bit more complicated, and people are a little more difficult — in the final is very pleasing.

Love line pleased with his realism and unobtrusive.

Despite not the most exciting topics in the film has enough humor without any affectation — laugh the hall was heard often. But still there perfectly matched, fitting in perfectly with the music.

The film perfectly captures the desire for the struggle, the freedom and optimism of the protagonist Thurgood Marshall. The nicer that it is based on real events. He may even become one of my favorite movies.

"the Only way to sign in to door to racist — to break it"

Cleopatra Lichter
04 January 2020 | 12:22

Every day is a struggle, in the heat are not always made by the parties to the conflict doubt that would point to their disputes, but sometimes they gaining a new momentum, only because of stubbornness involved. In short, at stake could be that want a trivial satisfaction of vanity to (in global scope) of someone's life. The arrogance of these with early childhood nourished environment, without tired of Bouncing around the money bag, in hopes to grab at least a piece of attention, of course, in tangible currency. People, absorbed all the is a disgrace dictates loyal any immoral ideas, and until it has powerful arguments in the form of various privileges for them will go and only a small part of the courage to resist snickering bags. However, for this is not enough to be able to shout the loudest, you must have a certain knowledge, that you heard and saw those who infatuated with their own "greatness." The idea that the most important resource is not gold, and intelligence — relevant to all times. Let's order:

Characters:

Targu Marshall:

In 1941 was the only lawyer in the"National Association for colored people." For his career, this really existing person, helped to get out of the scrape of a huge number of poor, oppressed rotten system is unacceptable to the state of the device color of the skin. Now, it cause CT on the aid of Joseph Spell, accused of raping a white woman. In Greenwich, Mr. Marshall in again faces disregard the rights of the client, a direct denial of the defense of the defendant. The reason for the ridiculous — unnecessary additional specialist higher authority as just the same dealing with such cases. Have Tergoda taken away the right of the word "magnanimous" gesture of leaving the prerogative for the presence hall. However, our he finds a way to a decent resistance, using a paper with a fountain pen, experience and immature the criminal process partner provided the local law firm, "Friedman and Friedman".

Sam Friedman:

A young craftsman who learned his craft on insurance small claims and earned some reputation in narrow circles, Willy-nilly becomes a partner Tergoda Marshall and literally speaks for his meetings, seasoning his speech last, ill-prepared additional notes, assisting the Prosecutor. The however, new circumstances of the crime, Friedman begins stronger stand on his feet, despite the altercation with other problems family and the threat of life with a radical whites.

Eleanor Strubing:

High position, education, wealth and the respect of others don't make it happy. Mrs. Strubing under the watchful sight of a brutal husband and the public, violates the law about the evidence of the fear of being disgraced. Women need attention, affection, kindness — devoid of all, she succumbed to a moment of weakness, for which paying, transferring commensurate with the act of suffering.

Joseph Spell:

Driver couple Strubing, father abandoned them children, the military fired, the rapist and black — here is a rough portrait of Joseph. Is it possible to judge people for their past, given how lousy sewn in than accused of present? It will find out a graduate of Howard, in the course of a dangerous investigation with a confusing under the feet of law enforcement officers and citizens in that would any was, showed loyalty to the country where prevails in racial discrimination. Actually there is a fight a good name of all law-abiding blacks, because it is "Connecticut V. Joseph Spell" put them very nice imprint.

Acting:

Chadwick Bosman in the role Tergoda Marshall — the main star of the film. it is Difficult to say how much he approached the image of a famous lawyer, but I obviously how good his playing the main dramatic and humorous scenes. Josh Gad, embodied Sam Friedman — this is a train wreck (in a good way), awkward places, but an attractive his sincerity that not to sympathize with him is simply impossible. Joseph Spell in the performance Sterling brown — a contradictory character. Watching him, the viewer is torn between sympathy and censure. In fairness we have to admit than on narrative, the more prevalent first.

Result: "Marshall is" Reginald Hudlin says, to which brings terrible consequences of loneliness. I recommend that You this great picture and ourselves to make sure that.

8 from 10

faq
How long is Marshall?
2h 38m
How much has Marshall made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are $8,891,678.
How much did it cost to make Marshall?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $12,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Marshall?
This tv-show was directed by Reginald Hudlin.
What is the genre of Marshall?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Drama, Biography, Best movies 2017.
Who starred in Marshall?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Chadwick Boseman, Josh Gad, Kate Hudson, Sterling K. Brown, Dan Stevens.
What is Marshall IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 7.2.
When was Marshall released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2017-10-13.